- Jun 23, 2020
- 5,968
- 8,629
That would be very high for Rutta.3 7th round picks
That would be very high for Rutta.3 7th round picks
I would happily trade all 3 for whatever the best offer is, but I don't expect to be offered much.Not many, but you can always bundle lower picks together and trun them around on another deal? or would you just want to keep those guys?
Depends on how injuries go for other teams.How many high picks you think we can get for Kunin, Sturm, and Rutta?
Considering stuart was only in his early 20's when i joined the sharks wagon with his departure and i was also early 20's yup very old.Brad Stuart's son plays for the NTDP... man I feel old.
Pithy and accurate. First tag line I've seen in this whole thread I can get behind.Play like your most of your defensemen are worse than Luca Sbisa for Michael Misa.
Very nice. Best part is Sbisa works for the Sharks now.Play like your most of your defensemen are worse than Luca Sbisa for Michael Misa.
Everything is becoming clear now!Very nice. Best part is Sbisa works for the Sharks now.
Outside of marleau, the player development team is a whos who of i barely made a play my entire career.Everything is becoming clear now!
The question is, can you get behind Misa at 1OV? Statistically, his profile is arguably the best of the big 4. But feels like people hold him in a lower regard than the other 3.Pithy and accurate. First tag line I've seen in this whole thread I can get behind.
At 1OA? No. At 3OA, where we are statistically most likely to land? Absolutely.The question is, can you get behind Misa at 1OV? Statistically, his profile is arguably the best of the big 4. But feels like people hold him in a lower regard than the other 3.
I feel like the way Macklin is playing, and the signs that Smith and Askarov are showing mean you have to keep Granlund (assuming he is willing to resign).Sharks UFA's after this season: Granlund, Kunin, Sturm, Rutta, Ceci. I say deal them all for high picks in the next 2-3 years drafts, and/or prospects, and/or strategic player targets.
Almost forgot the goalies, UFA's Blackwood and Vanicek
50/50, we either get him or don't.What are the chances we get Schaefer without the lottery win? Feels like Chicago could go either way with him or another forward to give Bedard some much needed help. Not sure about the other bottom dwellers.
Break like a wafer, Draft Matt Schaefer... Play Badly for Matty?
Bad Play-fer Matt Schaefer?
Suck for Schaefer is a bit pedestrian but might be the kind of slogan that wins elections
As of right now? Certainly possible. Hagens, Martone, and Schaefer are all viable choices at 1st overall right now, and while I have yet to see a list with Misa 1st overall, I've seen plenty of him at 2nd and he could still have another gear.What are the chances we get Schaefer without the lottery win? Feels like Chicago could go either way with him or another forward to give Bedard some much needed help. Not sure about the other bottom dwellers.
Really? After the absolute bullshit rappers get paid for these days?I feel like this group desperately needs a class on acceptable rhyming.
They aren’t the gold standard. This is HFboards. We exist far above the rest of society.Really? After the absolute bullshit rappers get paid for these days?
Take out those 9 games and we are 7-6-3 in 16 games. 17 points in 16 games. Points % of 1.06.As of Thanksgiving (happy one to you all!), the Sharks:
Lots could happen, and the team is a huge step above last year, but it is indeed projecting to be a bottom 2 team. We may be really glad for the 0-7-2 start by the end of the season.
- Have the lowest point % per Tankathon.
- Are second-lowest ranked in Moneypuck's Power Ranking a.k.a. chance of winning against the average NHL team - ANA amazingly is worse due mostly to terrible 5v5 play and a weak PP (and power play )
- Have the fourth-hardest remaining strength of schedule according to Tankathon (ANA worst, then DET and NYI).
- Are projected to finish last with 65.4 points, according to Moneypuck.
Macklin being injured played a big part in the poor start. They’re 4-5-4 with him. Had he not gotten hurt their record would be better.As of Thanksgiving (happy one to you all!), the Sharks:
Lots could happen, and the team is a huge step above last year, but it is indeed projecting to be a bottom 2 team. We may be really glad for the 0-7-2 start by the end of the season.
- Have the lowest point % per Tankathon.
- Are second-lowest ranked in Moneypuck's Power Ranking a.k.a. chance of winning against the average NHL team - ANA amazingly is worse due mostly to terrible 5v5 play and a weak PP (and power play )
- Have the fourth-hardest remaining strength of schedule according to Tankathon (ANA worst, then DET and NYI).
- Are projected to finish last with 65.4 points, according to Moneypuck.
We've seen the F3 track to the puck and the defensemen hold their lanes, as long as it's before the red line and/or the back check is sufficient, so he probably made the right read but too late, causing harder reads for Thrun and Benning. This is basically what Jack Han said. The system has been clearer and more stable lately, likely owing to the team just getting more familiar and it becoming more second nature. Therefore we've seen the F3 attack the puck immediately in the NZ, and sometimes as the break approaches the OZ, but not at the expense of the middle ice.I think that the staff did change a couple aspects of the system too. Like we were kinda piling on Smith and who the F3 tracks back on during back checks but we haven't really seen that issue lately.