HF Habs: - 2025 NHL Draft: Part II | Page 121 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League
Toggle sidebar

HF Habs: 2025 NHL Draft: Part II

Wouldn't be surprised if they are one of the teams willing to take the Ryabkin swing and also try to position themselves for Horcoff in the 2nd round.
 
  • Like
Reactions: overlords
WeThreeKings said:


Not sure how they could give Utah anything for 4OA as they're in the same spot as us.
Click to expand...

I would think of a package of something around:
  • Caufield
  • Habs 1st round pick #16 or 17th
  • one of the Habs 2nd round pick or Logan Mailloux/Owen Beck

Can't think of anything else on the Habs that could fill a need for Utah...
Slafkovsky, Hutson, Suzuki, Reinbacher and Demidov are the untouchables for me.
 
Erika said:
I would think of a package of something around:
  • Caufield
  • Habs pick #16 or 17th
  • one of the Habs 2nd round pick or Logan Mailloux/Owen Beck

Can't think of anything that could fill a need for Utah...
Slafkovsky, Hutson, Suzuki, Reinbacher and Demidov are the untouchables for me.
Click to expand...
Which the Habs are not in a position to offer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dinodebino and CristianoRonaldo
Erika said:
I would think of a package of something around:
  • Caufield
  • Habs pick #16 or 17th
  • one of the Habs 2nd round pick or Logan Mailloux/Owen Beck

Can't think of anything else on the Habs that could fill a need for Utah...
Slafkovsky, Hutson, Suzuki, Reinbacher and Demidov are the untouchables for me.
Click to expand...

And the Habs aren't doing that, so there's really no fit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dinodebino, Estimated_Prophet, CristianoRonaldo and 1 other person
So Reschny is taller than Hagens. Just asking some other posters that are so adamant about size, If Hagens was available at our pick we should also pass on him, right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nevins
Erika said:
I would think of a package of something around:
  • Caufield
  • Habs 1st round pick #16 or 17th
  • one of the Habs 2nd round pick or Logan Mailloux/Owen Beck

Can't think of anything else on the Habs that could fill a need for Utah...
Slafkovsky, Hutson, Suzuki, Reinbacher and Demidov are the untouchables for me.
Click to expand...
The only way we trade Caufield for the 4th pick is if we gave a side deal for Robertson (and i don’t know What we can offer them except future and if it’s What they want, they should go for the 4th pick)
 
crosbyshow said:
He has IQ and vision. IQ..THE MOST important thing in Hockey

Don't worry I heard the same thing about a dude like Sakic in 1987....and rhe Nordiques were upset when Boston drafted the big bumb Stephane Quintal at 14th..

Then they went with their plan B...a dude named Joe Sakic at ...5.10 1/2 and 185 pounds...wowww what a small guy he was......lollll
Click to expand...
Montreal wanted Quintal for years and acquired him when they got the chance. Not a bad player but weirdly overrated by GMs.
 
JeffreyLFC said:
So Reschny is taller than Hagens. Just asking some other posters that are so adamant about size, If Hagens was available at our pick we should also pass on him, right?
Click to expand...
Hagens is a phenomenal skater and he’s also more talented. It’s not a comparison.

And no one is adamant about size. The argument is that Bobrov wouldn’t pick Reschny based on his history of 1st round picks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WeThreeKings
le_sean said:
Hagens is a phenomenal skater and he’s also more talented. It’s not a comparison.

And no one is adamant about size. The argument is that Bobrov wouldn’t pick Reschny based on his history of 1st round picks.
Click to expand...
Yep it is the case with bobrov but it is a discussion forum and we can discuss about our own pick and at 16th..personally my choice would be Reschny for many reasons.
 
le_sean said:
Hagens is a phenomenal skater and he’s also more talented. It’s not a comparison.

And no one is adamant about size. The argument is that Bobrov wouldn’t pick Reschny based on his history of 1st round picks.
Click to expand...
Hagens is not a phenomenal skater and Reschny is not a bad skater either.

Bobrov might not pick Reschny but like they did with Michkov or Cooley. It might not be a good decision. Their best pick was a midget and I don't think any Habs fans are mad about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: crosbyshow
JeffreyLFC said:
Hagens is not a phenomenal skater and Reschny is not a bad skater either.

Bobrov might not pick Reschny but like they did with Michkov or Cooley. It might not be a good decision. Their best pick was a midget and I don't think any Habs fans are mad about it.
Click to expand...
What? Hagens is a great skater and Reschny is average at best.

Reschny isn’t Michkov or Cooley. There’s a reason he’s going 15-30.
 
le_sean said:
What? Hagens is a great skater and Reschny is average at best.

Reschny isn’t Michkov or Cooley. There’s a reason he’s going 15-30.
Click to expand...
Just tell me you have not watched Reschny if you truly believe what you wrote? Reschny average at best? He is a better skater than Suzuki was in his draft year, was Suzuki a bad skater and a bad pick too?
 
JeffreyLFC said:
Just tell me you have not watched Reschny if you truly believe what you wrote? Reschny average at best? He is a better skater than Suzuki was in his draft year, was Suzuki a bad skater and a bad pick too?
Click to expand...
Better skater than Suzuki in his draft year doesn’t mean much. EP, who tend to love players like Reschny, have his skating a 4.5 out of 9. Hagens a 7.0

I also didn’t say he’s a bad pick. Stop conflating what I’m saying.

Why isn’t he going Top 10 in a weaker draft if he’s for sure another Suzuki?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • ... and 6 more.
    • Total: 51 (members: 35, guests: 16)

    Latest posts

    Ad

    Ad

    Top Bottom