My answers to some rando comments in this thread:
Yes, Nill should have had more D. However, when he kept 8 D around this board crucified him as wasting money on that.
Some say we can't win with PDB, well I think they say that about every coach and player until they actually do win. (Think Eddie Belfour when we got him....that was the knock but he didn't play on the favored team in his trips to the PO until the '99 Stars.)
Some suggest replacing our top guys with "proven playoff performers." The fact is, no player has probably ever had a consistent year to year performance in the PO's. Hintz was great last year, possibly injured and less effective this year. Neither has anything to do with how he will do next year if we make the playoffs again.
Some say we should go for more top end players. Frankly, it is probably statistically better to do what Nill did - acquire enough talent so that if one goes down, the others can step up. No guarantee that they will, but if McDavid goes down early this round, his replacement is unlikely to step up, there is too big a gap.
Basically, any plan a GM has is a crapshoot. It is sometimes luck when a team gets hot at playoff time. In retrospect, maybe playing less hard to get that home ice advantage wore them out too much. However, we will probably get in as a low seed next year, and lose a road game 7 to stop us. Then we will clamor to play for the Western Conference crown, and that may fail again, as well.