Speculation: 2024/25 Trade Rumours, Speculation etc Thread

Flair Hay

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jun 22, 2010
12,551
5,850
Winnipeg
According to money puck the Jets second line has 11 GF this year with one of their Fwds having 0. The other two top 9 lines have 13 GF each.

Yet the player with 5/11 goals is the problem.
Yeah I don't agree that anyone on that line is a big problem. We are a .800 pts % tram right now. We can use some of that good grace to let a young guy play his way out of a slump.

I'm not opposed to Perfetti being a trade chip for a dman. Beats sending our former top ten pick to the press box again.
 

surixon

Registered User
Jul 12, 2003
51,003
75,371
Winnipeg
In all honesty the second line has played better the last 10 games then they did the first 13. They are generating a lot more and giving up less. But they have seen a regression towards the mean in terms of their finishing. They were never going to continue to finish on 12% of their shots that they did the first 13. They also aren't going to continue to finish on the 7% of their shots they have the last 10 games either. They will likely trend back up towards 9%.

The third line will start to see a regression in their finishing as well as they were also finishing around 12%.
 

sipowicz

The thrill is gone
Mar 16, 2011
32,377
43,618
Names on pace for 51 points, Perfetti on pace for 55... Names possession numbers are pretty strong - I wouldn't mess with things too much

I still prefer the Nino-Names-Ehlers line but Im also not sure Perfetti is ready to play a shut down role against the opposition top guys
Perfetan is playing a shutdown game against the Jets, the pretend top sixer belongs on the 4th line!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: WolfHouse

Flair Hay

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jun 22, 2010
12,551
5,850
Winnipeg
In all honesty the second line has played better the last 10 games then they did the first 13. They are generating a lot more and giving up less. But they have seen a regression towards the mean in terms of their finishing. They were never going to continue to finish on 12% of their shots that they did the first 13. They also aren't going to continue to finish on the 7% of their shots they have the last 10 games either. They will likely trend back up towards 9%.

The third line will start to see a regression in their finishing as well as they were also finishing around 12%.
I think it's important to emphasize they aren't hurting us much, even when they are not scoring...

5 goals against in 23 games

This year, and last year combined from moneypuck:
57 games
400 minutes
22 goals
11 goals against

Not expected goals, not advanced stats, not per minute, just how this trio is doing on the scoreboard.

We should start discussing them like they are part of the engine driving this team, not one of the pieces holding it back
 

Whileee

Registered User
May 29, 2010
46,557
35,063
One thing to consider for the Jets is that they have a particular style and system, and they need players that can fit in (especially if they are in the bottom-6. Appleton isn't great, but he's fast and smart on the forecheck and he's not expensive. The Jets made the mistake last year of acquiring Monahan and Toffoli and they didn't play the high-pace, high pressure style that had been so effective. I think that they could plug Chibrikov or Lambert into a winger position this season and they would do fine. If they are going to go for a big upgrade, it should be for a big, fast and effective 2C (for Ehlers and Perfetti) or a difference-maker on D (instead of DeMelo, maybe). The only caveat is that it would probably be Miller that would end up in the press box and he's actually been been one of the better D for the Jets. DeMelo has struggled a lot this s season, but will likely not be benched if they acquire another D.
 

Wpgpage

Registered User
Nov 25, 2010
911
115
I actually think Monahan was a great fit with Ehlers. He was awful in the playoffs as was the rest of the team but in 34 games spent almost entirely with Ehlers he put up 19 even strength points.

Toffoli yeah that didn't work out no.
 

voyageur

Hockey fanatic
Jul 10, 2011
10,566
10,006
I think it's important to emphasize they aren't hurting us much, even when they are not scoring...

5 goals against in 23 games

This year, and last year combined from moneypuck:
57 games
400 minutes
22 goals
11 goals against

Not expected goals, not advanced stats, not per minute, just how this trio is doing on the scoreboard.

We should start discussing them like they are part of the engine driving this team, not one of the pieces holding it back
I was looking on Natural Stat Trick for some background. That line has 135 offensive zone faceoffs, 62 neutral zone, and 39 defensive zone. Lowry's line which is outscroing teams a greater pace has taken 52 offensive zone draws, 119 neutral zone draws and 108 defensive zone draws.

So they are without a doubt the drivers of the bus. The 2nd line is getting scored on less that the top line, but they have had the least amount of defensive responsibility of any line of the team. And frankly it's because you can't trust either Perfetti or Ehlers in the defensive zone. The good thing is they can use a fair amount of speed to negate any sustained attack from the primarily o-zone starts.
 

Flair Hay

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jun 22, 2010
12,551
5,850
Winnipeg
I was looking on Natural Stat Trick for some background. That line has 135 offensive zone faceoffs, 62 neutral zone, and 39 defensive zone. Lowry's line which is outscroing teams a greater pace has taken 52 offensive zone draws, 119 neutral zone draws and 108 defensive zone draws.

So they are without a doubt the drivers of the bus. The 2nd line is getting scored on less that the top line, but they have had the least amount of defensive responsibility of any line of the team. And frankly it's because you can't trust either Perfetti or Ehlers in the defensive zone. The good thing is they can use a fair amount of speed to negate any sustained attack from the primarily o-zone starts.
No argument from me that it is Lowry line that is our best line by fsr this year, and overall both years.

Who I'm comparing them to is Scheifele line.

No reason to me Perfetti and Ehlers can't be trusted in their own end. Especially if it's implied Scheif and Connor can be.

Maybe we could balance out those ozone starts with Scheif's line a bit?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Huffer

voyageur

Hockey fanatic
Jul 10, 2011
10,566
10,006
No argument from me that it is Lowry line that is our best line by fsr this year, and overall both years.

Who I'm comparing them to is Scheifele line.

No reason to me Perfetti and Ehlers can't be trusted in their own end. Especially if it's implied Scheif and Connor can be.

Maybe we could balance out those ozone starts with Scheif's line a bit?
I think Scheif and KC are trusted by Arny. Especially KC because you hear the coach talk about his game. Scheif is more the horse he has to ride to have success. Last game won't inspire any more trust in Perfetti and Ehlers as both missed a chance to prevent a goal in a 1 goal game. Details.

Scheif's line has 130 o-zone starts so they are not far behind, but 96/61 NZ and DZ. So there is clearly only one line that is getting the majority of its starts from the o-zone where it is easist to score from. I thought this is relevant because for years people used xGoals, Corsi as a sign that Ehlers was a superior defensive player on this team. Without ever qualifying zone starts.
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad