Grate n Colorful Oz
The Hutson Hawk
Nope that's just fiction.
Not fiction. The game was definitely slower and the average athlete less talented and the difference in equipment is highly overstated.
Nope that's just fiction.
Um what? I grew up watching hockey in the mid 70’s and have followed ever since. What exactly is fiction? Watch old clip of games from the 60’s, 70’s and parts of the 80’s and tell me that there weren’t a lot of slow moving players compared to today. Remember when they played the Soviets for the first time in ‘72? Canada couldn’t keep up. What we consider slow today would be much faster back then. You can’t measure speed by comparing it to your opponents. A turtle looks fast compared to a snail. But it’s not actually moving that fast. Its perception. As for Mcdavid, I’m talking speed not moves.Nope that's just fiction. Also, put McDavid in the old game and his ankles would snap trying some moves with those skates.
Yes. Thank you!Not fiction. The game was definitely slower and the average athlete less talented and the difference in equipment is highly overstated.
Better to be too fast than too slow. One is an issue you can address, the other, you can’t. Just ask the myriad of players playing in the AHL who can’t breach the gap to the NHL.
Ummm...Remember when they played the Soviets for the first time in ‘72? Canada couldn’t keep up.
That’s why the question: who is/was the best Canadiens’ skater? Is really difficult to answer.I think you have to separate it by eras. You have to keep in mind that back then, there were a LOT of slow moving, out of shape players. A decent skater could look like McDavid out there. Put him in today’s game, and he looks like Gally. You have to view it according to the other skaters at the time.
Um. Ya fat and out of shape as I basically said. And I know I’ll lose my Canadian citizenship for this, but the biggest reason Canada beat them is because they gooned it up. They played dirty and got away with it. Overall, the Soviets were much better skaters. Yes of course there were fast players on Canada. I’m not saying that. My original argument is that you can’t call a guy “fast” if the competition is generally slow.Ummm...
One team was honed to a sharp edge from the outset while the other team was fat and out of game shape.
Paul Henderson and company had no problem keeping up with the Soviets by games 6-7-8.
1000%. The ever so elusive IQ stat which doesn't exist atm..There are also a ton of fast Ahlers who can't make the NHL.....speed pales in comparison to hockey IQ as an essential component to NHL success.
Yeah skaters like Coffey and Neidermeyer would excel just as well in today's game as would forwards like Glenn Anderson and Mike Modano.Whenever I overhear or see folks debating over different eras, can't help but laugh some as it's a silly waste of time, but it's their time and they can fritter it away the way they want to.
Neat, but even as a novice in the hockey shop business, I've handled skates that were 40+ years old. I know that the tech is so wildly different that if McDavid tried some of his high speed electric moves, the skates wouldn't support his weight anywhere near the way they do now. There's a skate blade company that claims something like a 2-5%~ increase in skating speed because their blades use a form of steel that compresses better and can use the resulting force when pushing off of a skate to increase speed more efficiently.Um what? I grew up watching hockey in the mid 70’s and have followed ever since. What exactly is fiction? Watch old clip of games from the 60’s, 70’s and parts of the 80’s and tell me that there weren’t a lot of slow moving players compared to today. Remember when they played the Soviets for the first time in ‘72? Canada couldn’t keep up. What we consider slow today would be much faster back then. You can’t measure speed by comparing it to your opponents. A turtle looks fast compared to a snail. But it’s not actually moving that fast. Its perception. As for Mcdavid, I’m talking speed not moves.
Yes. Thank you!
Who was the best at dumping the puck in and going for a line change?
Neat, but even as a novice in the hockey shop business, I've handled skates that were 40+ years old. I know that the tech is so wildly different that if McDavid tried some of his high speed electric moves, the skates wouldn't support his weight anywhere near the way they do now.
There's a skate blade company that claims something like a 2-5%~ increase in skating speed because their blades use a form of steel that compresses better and can use the resulting force when pushing off of a skate to increase speed more efficiently.
Without being partisan, there does seem to be some mitigating factor where on the whole I think generally athletes are in better shape now but it’s not this runaway advantage that it should be.You guys that put today’s athletes on a pedestal beside Zeus are crazy. You think Cy Young was tossing a 64mph fastball or something? Because he didn’t have access to BioSteel? Bobby Hull’s clapper shattered that post just because it wasn’t tempered or what?
Testosterone levels are down across the board over decades, and, no, it’s not just among the fat, unsporty swath of society. Exhibit A.Z.69:
He, Fowler and Demidov when he gets ice time are the only prospects outside of the ones with the Rocket who do much. Two were just drafted and 1st round picks.And he belongs to the Habs!!
2022 looks pretty amazing right now.He, Fowler and Demidov when he gets ice time are the only prospects outside of the ones with the Rocket who do much. Two were just drafted and 1st round picks.
This prospect pool needs work.
I forgot Bogdan and Sam Harris.2022 looks pretty amazing right now.
Already have 2 in the Habs and both are already impact players. Beck, Engstrom and Davidson are standouts in the AHL right now. The latter putting up gaudy goal totals.
2023’s top pick is injured. One of its other picks was just named to the KHL all star team. Xhekaj’s been great for a 4th rounder. Fowler like you said has been dominant.
2024 like you said has yielded 2 of the most promising forwards we’ve drafted in recent memory.
Where’s the problem?
Just ignore 2022 then? lol. Sure I guess.I forgot Bogdan and Sam Harris.
So 5 and Xhekaj, who's gone.
Has had 19 picks those two drafts. Let's add Reinbacher and Protz, who is hurt and a defensive dman.
That's 8 of 19 that are just playing meh.
You use 19 picks you're hoping around 15 are playing well, or surprising.
The later picks, yes they're pretty much all the same.Just ignore 2022 then? lol. Sure I guess.
The top guys all look great except Reinbacher who’s injured.
Who’s really underperforming that is of consequence right now? Tyler Thorpe would be one. Eriksson another. Both fairly late round picks. Are we counting the Mittlestadts and Merrills? Are we gonna just pretend all picks are of equal value and just ignore the quality?