Blue Jays Discussion: 2024-25 Off-season: The free agent watch begins (and sometimes old baseball radio broadcasts)

The Nemesis

Semper Tyrannus
Apr 11, 2005
89,833
35,079
Langley, BC


Unless the unthinkable happens and the Jays win the Soto lottery, I think Bregman is a nice first piece for Plan B (or realistic, non-Soto plan A). He's not what he was at his 2018-19 peak but the last 3 years he's played most of each season and been good for 20-25 HR, an OPS around or above .800, and solid enough D at 3rd.

That fills an important fielding hole with a guy who has a playable bat. Him and an OF wouldn't necessarily "fix" all the offensive problems, but they'd go a long way to lengthening the lineup so the problems that remain are coverable. Santander would be the ideal. Assuming Teoscar is set on returning to LA then Tyler O'Neill is the best of the otherwise underwhelming set of corner OF fallbacks, but signing him means living with the fact that he is best as the weak side of a platoon because he crushes LHP but is very underwhelming vs RHP.

That means next year's lineup could conceivably be something like

1) Springer (RF)
2) Guerrero (1B)
3) Bichette (SS)
4) Bregman (3B)
5) Santander^/O'Neill (LF)
6) Horwitz (DH)*
7) Kirk (C)
8) Wagner (2B)*
9) Varsho (CF)*

*LH Bat
^Switch Hitter

As much as the Jays keep popping up on lists of teams going after pitching, that's a secondary concern that can be answered from the 2nd or 3rd tier of FA arms or risky upside bets because mostly they need to add a 4/5 and maybe a couple of depth arms that can be ready in case of injury or performance based attrition. And filling out the pen is a fairly low-cost exercise in buying a ton of lottery tickets and using the spring to see which ones pay off because spending "proven closer" money is often foolish and easily destructive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hockeywiz542

Kurtz

Registered User
Jul 17, 2005
10,406
7,522
Unless the unthinkable happens and the Jays win the Soto lottery, I think Bregman is a nice first piece for Plan B (or realistic, non-Soto plan A). He's not what he was at his 2018-19 peak but the last 3 years he's played most of each season and been good for 20-25 HR, an OPS around or above .800, and solid enough D at 3rd.

That fills an important fielding hole with a guy who has a playable bat. Him and an OF wouldn't necessarily "fix" all the offensive problems, but they'd go a long way to lengthening the lineup so the problems that remain are coverable. Santander would be the ideal. Assuming Teoscar is set on returning to LA then Tyler O'Neill is the best of the otherwise underwhelming set of corner OF fallbacks, but signing him means living with the fact that he is best as the weak side of a platoon because he crushes LHP but is very underwhelming vs RHP.

That means next year's lineup could conceivably be something like

1) Springer (RF)
2) Guerrero (1B)
3) Bichette (SS)
4) Bregman (3B)
5) Santander^/O'Neill (LF)
6) Horwitz (DH)*
7) Kirk (C)
8) Wagner (2B)*
9) Varsho (CF)*

*LH Bat
^Switch Hitter

As much as the Jays keep popping up on lists of teams going after pitching, that's a secondary concern that can be answered from the 2nd or 3rd tier of FA arms or risky upside bets because mostly they need to add a 4/5 and maybe a couple of depth arms that can be ready in case of injury or performance based attrition. And filling out the pen is a fairly low-cost exercise in buying a ton of lottery tickets and using the spring to see which ones pay off because spending "proven closer" money is often foolish and easily destructive.

Thing with Bregman is, while he's still productive, I wonder how much of a premium you're paying on him for his name alone. Seems very reminiscent of the Springer deal.
 

Discoverer

Registered User
Apr 11, 2012
11,280
6,661
Thing with Bregman is, while he's still productive, I wonder how much of a premium you're paying on him for his name alone. Seems very reminiscent of the Springer deal.
I'm torn on Bregman. You look at his production the last few years and see a decline (137 to 126 to 118 wRC+) and that's pretty concerning as he's now into his 30s. But a 118 wRC+ is still good and the defense is still a plus, so he's still a 4 WAR player at that level.

The weirdest thing I can see is that the offensive decline in 2024 was driven almost entirely by his walk rate dropping almost in half. Everything else is pretty much right in line with what you would expect based on previous years, and not walking as much because you started chasing outside the zone a bit more doesn't strike me as an age-related decline. I don't know what to make of it, though.

He would obviously improve the team a ton for the next couple years, but I kind of worry about the kind of contract he'll get.
 

Suntouchable13

Registered User
Dec 20, 2003
44,683
20,972
Toronto, ON
I'm torn on Bregman. You look at his production the last few years and see a decline (137 to 126 to 118 wRC+) and that's pretty concerning as he's now into his 30s. But a 118 wRC+ is still good and the defense is still a plus, so he's still a 4 WAR player at that level.

The weirdest thing I can see is that the offensive decline in 2024 was driven almost entirely by his walk rate dropping almost in half. Everything else is pretty much right in line with what you would expect based on previous years, and not walking as much because you started chasing outside the zone a bit more doesn't strike me as an age-related decline. I don't know what to make of it, though.

He would obviously improve the team a ton for the next couple years, but I kind of worry about the kind of contract he'll get.

If Jays really want him, I am ok with a 5 year deal which takes him to 35 years old.
 

Ale Brew

Registered User
Feb 24, 2020
367
233
Bregman is an interesting case. If they sign him I’ll be happy in that it’ll help them significantly in the short term.

That said, some of the numbers being thrown out there (likely from Boras) are rediculous and I want nothing to do with.

Realistically he’s ideally a 3 yr $80M guy, but there’s probably no chance that gets him. Sounds like Boras is looking for 7 years and close to $200M.

So yeah, in the short term hell yeah, but the contract he signs likely ends worse than Springer’s.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hockeywiz542

The Nemesis

Semper Tyrannus
Apr 11, 2005
89,833
35,079
Langley, BC
Thing with Bregman is, while he's still productive, I wonder how much of a premium you're paying on him for his name alone. Seems very reminiscent of the Springer deal.

Granted. That is a totally fair concern. The counterargument is that MLB free agency is usually so late for most players that this applies to almost anyone of consequence. Soto hitting free agency in the middle of his prime is the outlier and most of the time you're getting guys who are at or creeping up on 30 but who still want long-ish term contracts that will take them well into their decline phases. Or guys who have shown warning signs that they might already be declining and you have to weigh whether or not those are serious concerns or not. So if you want someone of consequence out of the FA pool you've pretty much gotta be fine with taking that risk and hoping that whoever you sign doesn't become a total albatross before the last couple years of their new deal. And we've seen the reaction and results to the team doing nothing in free agency except fiddling around the edges, so biting that bullet is almost a necessary evil.

I wouldn't sign him for 8 or 9 years or anything crazy like that but a front-loaded 5 or 6 year deal is an acceptable gamble that he'll still be at least a decent defender and passable hitter by the end of it or that if he falls off a cliff you've only got 1 or 2 years of suckitude to eat.

The other thing that's a plus for the Jays is that while they still have to work on extensions for the young core, the only major commitments on the books going forward are:

2 more years of Springer @ about $24m per
2 more years of Gausman @ about $23m per
4 more years of Berrios @ $19-24m per

source: Cot's Baseball Contracts' Jays salary tracker google sheet

Otherwise they're pretty much free and clear of any long-term big money risks after Bassitt's contract is up next winter with the only real potential sticking point being 3 more years of Berrios where he's had hiccups the last few years but not been in outright decline. So by the time a Bregman deal is likely to become a boat anchor they'll have already avoided or survived their current round of potential boat anchors or, worst case scenario, be on the hook for Berrios over the short term.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Forgotusername

ChuckNorris4Cup

Registered User
May 31, 2018
3,094
2,370
Say the jays move Bassitt for some more flexibility, they could technically manage and try.

1. Gausman
2. Berrios
3. Francis
4. Rodriguez
5. Manoah

At the same time there are a lot of pitchers available in free agency that they could pick up 1 at a good value incase those bottom 2 on my list aren't an option.

Good list here of all free agents available and for pitchers show their WAR Bassitt WAR in 2024 was -0.1

https://www.mlb.com/news/2024-25-mlb-free-agents-by-position
 

Dr.Funk

Registered User
Jul 2, 2004
19,969
2,656
Say the jays move Bassitt for some more flexibility, they could technically manage and try.

1. Gausman
2. Berrios
3. Francis
4. Rodriguez
5. Manoah

At the same time there are a lot of pitchers available in free agency that they could pick up 1 at a good value incase those bottom 2 on my list aren't an option.

Good list here of all free agents available and for pitchers show their WAR Bassitt WAR in 2024 was -0.1

https://www.mlb.com/news/2024-25-mlb-free-agents-by-position

Manoah is out for the year
 

Blitzkrug

Registered User
Sep 17, 2013
27,566
9,451
Winnipeg



I'm still convinced Soto ends up in Boston. The guy who initially "broke" the story is doubling down on it with a couple other key factors to consider;

- Him and Devers are boys, Devers has apparently been the guy doing the majority of the leg work for the Sox

- Soto was known to be a Sox fan growing up in the Dominican Republic, likely because of the country's connection to their glory days. Said connection in David Ortiz, Manny Ramirez (now back and on good terms with the org again) and Pedro Martinez have also apparently been involved in the process.

- Signing a guy on thanksgiving isn't really new. In fact, the Red Sox did it with another key piece of their recent history when they nabbed Curt Schilling way back when by having dinner at his place.

Might be bullshit, but i'll give the guy my attention given he's willing to push all his chips in the table rather than backpedaling.
 

ChuckNorris4Cup

Registered User
May 31, 2018
3,094
2,370
Manoah is out for the year

I think he’s out until mid season, but your right, he’ll need time to ramp up and can’t really be counted on for the rotation this year.

I also think they see Rodriguez as a BP contributor this year.

Definitely right about Manoah probably mid 2025 I forgot about that, and as for Rodriguez I'd agree there, don't know if he will be good enough to be a starter, but they'll probably try again and see, I would like to move on from Bassitt if possible somehow.
 

dredeye

BJ Elitist/Hipster
Mar 3, 2008
27,451
3,114
Say the jays move Bassitt for some more flexibility, they could technically manage and try.

1. Gausman
2. Berrios
3. Francis
4. Rodriguez
5. Manoah

At the same time there are a lot of pitchers available in free agency that they could pick up 1 at a good value incase those bottom 2 on my list aren't an option.

Good list here of all free agents available and for pitchers show their WAR Bassitt WAR in 2024 was -0.1

https://www.mlb.com/news/2024-25-mlb-free-agents-by-position
If your goal is not to win that’s a great starting rotation for that
 

phillipmike

Registered User
Oct 27, 2009
12,719
8,642



I'm still convinced Soto ends up in Boston. The guy who initially "broke" the story is doubling down on it with a couple other key factors to consider;

- Him and Devers are boys, Devers has apparently been the guy doing the majority of the leg work for the Sox

- Soto was known to be a Sox fan growing up in the Dominican Republic, likely because of the country's connection to their glory days. Said connection in David Ortiz, Manny Ramirez (now back and on good terms with the org again) and Pedro Martinez have also apparently been involved in the process.

- Signing a guy on thanksgiving isn't really new. In fact, the Red Sox did it with another key piece of their recent history when they nabbed Curt Schilling way back when by having dinner at his place.

Might be bullshit, but i'll give the guy my attention given he's willing to push all his chips in the table rather than backpedaling.


Where there is smoke, there is fire.

Though it reminds me of this;





1732916981688.png
 

Punch Drunk Loov

Thought Viktor Loov was going to be a guy
Dec 6, 2011
5,625
4,001
We've had some great names on the team. Socrates, Darwin, Ezekiel, all we need is someone to hit a... Homer
 

Discoverer

Registered User
Apr 11, 2012
11,280
6,661



I'm still convinced Soto ends up in Boston. The guy who initially "broke" the story is doubling down on it with a couple other key factors to consider;

- Him and Devers are boys, Devers has apparently been the guy doing the majority of the leg work for the Sox

- Soto was known to be a Sox fan growing up in the Dominican Republic, likely because of the country's connection to their glory days. Said connection in David Ortiz, Manny Ramirez (now back and on good terms with the org again) and Pedro Martinez have also apparently been involved in the process.

- Signing a guy on thanksgiving isn't really new. In fact, the Red Sox did it with another key piece of their recent history when they nabbed Curt Schilling way back when by having dinner at his place.

Might be bullshit, but i'll give the guy my attention given he's willing to push all his chips in the table rather than backpedaling.

I wouldn't be surprised at all if he does end up in Boston, but a bunch of guys reported on Ohtani to Toronto last year and then kept doubling down when they were questioned.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad