Prospect Info: 2024-25 Flyers Prospects - Top 20 SKATERS, #19

#19 skater prospect?

  • Helge Grans

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Ryan MacPherson

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Matteo Mann

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Ty Murchison

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Ethan Samson

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Zayde Wisdom

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Brian Zanetti

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    24
  • Poll closed .

Alex K

Registered User
Apr 20, 2016
2,702
3,831
Earth

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,050
22,221
Buium is an offense first LHD taken in the middle of the 1st rd, GIll is a big, project RHD taken late in the 2nd rd, since they traded up, it suggests to me they expected him to be off the board and jumped when he was still available.

There should be a number of smaller, skilled LHDs in the 2025 draft, I expect the Flyers to draft at least one if not more.
 

Tripod

I hate this team
Aug 12, 2008
79,242
87,026
Nova Scotia
Buium is an offense first LHD taken in the middle of the 1st rd, GIll is a big, project RHD taken late in the 2nd rd, since they traded up, it suggests to me they expected him to be off the board and jumped when he was still available.

There should be a number of smaller, skilled LHDs in the 2025 draft, I expect the Flyers to draft at least one if not more.
Still defending every mgt move I see.

Gulp, gulp
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ironmanrulez

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,050
22,221
Still defending every mgt move I see.

Gulp, gulp
The two decisions were separate. Buium v Luchanko/Helenius and trading up for Gill.
That's pretty obvious when you look at them.

Gill is a long-term project. Given our depth at RHD, he had to be BPA in their eyes.
 

FLYguy3911

Sanheim Lover
Oct 19, 2006
54,765
90,160
Here's a list of some players they traded up for in the past:

Bjarnason
Wisdom
Desnoyers
Brink
Ratcliffe
 

FLYguy3911

Sanheim Lover
Oct 19, 2006
54,765
90,160
I'm pretty sure they traded up to draft TK as well
Yes in a historic draft. Also 10 drafts ago at this point.

The focus was more on Day 2 trade ups, when the tiers smooth out, which have a horrendous track record league wide as some sort of evidence that a prospect is better than we are giving credit.
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,050
22,221
BPA doesn't take position into account. That's the whole point of BPA.
Only when there's a clear "winner." Once you get past the first few players, there tends to be "tiers" of players of similar value, so within a tier, you can go both BPA and take into account position.

Given the amount of variance involved in evaluating prospects, it's probably arbitrary to rank them numerically, as there's probably little or no difference between say player #17 and #22 on your board. So grouping them by tiers of players who you think have similar value makes more sense.
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad