cinchronicity
Registered User
Perhaps I erred with shorthand. I meant a 2nd line LHD. In this hypothetical:I guess I just don't see the point in another team giving up their 2D for Toews who's also a 2D?
A 3 team trade would make more sense, but probably doesn't happen because 3 team trades are damn hard to make work.
Girard - Makar
New 2LHD - Manson
New 3LHD - Malinski
At LHD the Avs spend $7.25 (Toews) + $5M (Girard) + $1M ( Revolving door) = $13.25M
A trade of Toews could result in $5M ( Girard) + $5M (New) + $2.25M ( New) = $12.25M
The latter would leave some pocket change for Malinski, who is an RFA next year. This is similar to the Mikko situation where a clever GM could gain enough assets that the sum would be superior to the single part -- in this case, Toews. I know this is not happening, but I'll vomit if I have to read any more unenlightened scenarios for Mikko to be traded for a haul next month.