monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"
Speculation: - 2024-2025 General Lightning Discussion II: New year, same Cooper shell | Page 16 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League
  • Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates, this is just a temporary look. We will continue to work on clearing up these issues for the next few days and restore the site to it's more familiar look, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into. Thanks for your patience and understanding.

Speculation: 2024-2025 General Lightning Discussion II: New year, same Cooper shell



Kreider healthy scratched tonight.

Not sure it's ever possible with a $6.5M hit until 27.

Double retentention, if the Rangers are burning it down. Not sure if we have the assets for that. But this type of player, even if not specifically him, takes us from a fringe contender to a contender IMO.

Cap is going up and we don't have any big raises coming, if I'm not mistaken.

I don't want anything to do with that piece of shit.
We took Corey Perry and he made us better.
 
What he does, he does extremely well, Kreider doesn’t do enough of the smaller things for me.
 
What he does, he does extremely well, Kreider doesn’t do enough of the smaller things for me.
Right, but he doesn't make a ton of money, especially with the assumption the cap will be going up. All we really need him to do is crash the net recklessly. We don't have that guy. But imagine that guy making goalies nervous while Kuch assesses his options.
 
Right, but he doesn't make a ton of money, especially with the assumption the cap will be going up. All we really need him to do is crash the net recklessly. We don't have that guy. But imagine that guy making goalies nervous while Kuch assesses his options.
If he was 28, and not 33, I could be convinced. With his playstyle, I would be nervous of his future production and injuries, and it looks like he’s already starting to slide.

If the Rangers were willing to eat 50% and he was extremely cheap to get asset wise, sure, but I don’t think that would be realistic. If he loses a step or becomes chronically injured, he’s an anchor for another two years. IMO
 
If he was 28, and not 33, I could be convinced. With his playstyle, I would be nervous of his future production and injuries, and it looks like he’s already starting to slide.

If the Rangers were willing to eat 50% and he was extremely cheap to get asset wise, sure, but I don’t think that would be realistic. If he loses a step or becomes chronically injured, he’s an anchor for another two years. IMO
We would be bringing him in for two years to try to make a run. This wouldn't be a rebuild move. It would be about loading up for what realistically could be the rest of the window.

I just don't think we could outbid the competition on a guy who plays this style. Contenders always need this.
 
We would be bringing him in for two years to try to make a run. This wouldn't be a rebuild move. It would be about loading up for what realistically could be the rest of the window.

I just don't think we could outbid the competition on a guy who plays this style. Contenders always need this.

What would you be willing to trade for him?
 
What would you be willing to trade for him?
Honestly probably not close to as much as a team with more assets. Definitely a 1st. Maybe a 1st and a prospect.

It's a gamble for sure. Because yeah, he could fall off a cliff as soon as this year. But the price would also be lower than a younger player like Tuch. I don't think we could come close to meeting that price tag. Kreider is a long shot, but it's possible.

The only really significant adds we have a chance to make will come with risks. We just don't have the assets.

I like Kreider's contract and love his style of play. I've wanted him for years but this might be the first time it's even plausible (forget realistic, because yeah, it's probably not).

Also, a note: JBB might be looking to get younger on the fly. The Guentzel move seems to show that. He might be looking for guys in the middle of their prime (30ish) rather than the end (35ish) in hopes of extending the window by a year or two. And so far he's been good with that.

But in the 2025 playoffs... man l, Chris Kreider makes us scary offensively. And Vasy looks like Vasy again.
 
Did a quick look at the trade board and it sounds like most are kinda thinking the same thing as me. Many posters who watch him on the regular are saying he is washed. At one point I woulda traded a kings ransom for him, but seems like we’re chasing shadows if we are expecting him to be what we want him to be.


 
Did a quick look at the trade board and it sounds like most are kinda thinking the same thing as me. Many posters who watch him in the regular are saying he washed. At one point I woulda traded a kings ransom for him, but seems like we’re chasing shadows if we are expecting him to be what we want him to be.


He scored 70+ points last year, and, this year, has been playing through an injury on a team that has quit.

This is the only reason why he might
possibly come down to our price range.

And 11 goals in 30 games with that dumpster fire is very likely still capable of 35 here.
 
He scored 70+ points last year, and, this year, has been playing through an injury on a team that has quit.

This is the only reason why he might
possibly come down to our price range.

If he’s just a little injured, I would give a 1st or a little more for 50% retention. Cap wise that is probably our only way anyways.

He could help us for our cup window, but if he’s cooked he could be pushing it shut. That’s a lot of cap space and risk
 
If he’s just a little injured, I would give a 1st or a little more for 50% retention. Cap wise that is probably our only way anyways.

He could help us for our cup window, but if he’s cooked he could be pushing it shut. That’s a lot of cal space
I'd give more than a 1st for 50% retention. Then you're talking about a 3.1m cap hit, which allows us to add another player in the off season. I would pay a pretty decent price for Kreider at that hit. Because it lowers the risk substantially. If he doesn't work out, he's easy to get rid of and probably good enough to keep. But there's still a solid chance he scores 8 or 10 hard-nosed playoff goals in 25 games.
 
I mean you guys were down for Kakko and he does shit all except have draft position stapled to his head.

The argument for Kreider is pretty straight forward.
 
I mean you guys were down for Kakko and he does shit all except have draft position stapled to his head.

The argument for Kreider is pretty straight forward.
Kakko has a contract we could’ve gotten without doing anything crazy. New York retaining 50% on Kreider for 3 years is so far-fetched it’s not worth thinking about.
 
I mean you guys were down for Kakko and he does shit all except have draft position stapled to his head.

The argument for Kreider is pretty straight forward.

What’s funny is Kakko somehow does shit all but still has out produced Kreider, doesn’t exactly inspire me to think it’s a trade that should be made
 
What’s funny is Kakko somehow does shit all but still has out produced Kreider, doesn’t exactly inspire me to think it’s a trade that should be made
That's a 30 game sample size though.
 
Tuch is a pipedream. He's too good and one of the few players that seem to care about playing in that team
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top
-->->