- May 4, 2004
- 5,805
- 19,106
Totally fine to gamble if you trade up to 5 or have the 8th pick though!Michkov's future is questionable because he's Russian. I doubt Habs take a gamble on him.
Totally fine to gamble if you trade up to 5 or have the 8th pick though!Michkov's future is questionable because he's Russian. I doubt Habs take a gamble on him.
I hope this is not based on info he received from Chantal.
why is it questionable?? He's here now??Michkov's future is questionable because he's Russian. I doubt Habs take a gamble on him.
You realise that a Russian superstar lighitng up the NHL is just the sort of national pride that Putin and indeed Russians in general would love, right?Michkov's future is questionable because he's Russian. I doubt Habs take a gamble on him.
I'm sorry for you but NO, I hope it's VERY exciting.Argh annoyed I’m going to miss watching the draft live. Hope it’s not too exciting - I’ll feel like I missed out otherwise lol
Most of the posters here weren’t born in 2003 so they wouldn’t know.
Would you be happy trading a potential Ovechkin for Konecny + Leonard? I doubt it.I could see them trade down with Philly and getting Konecny as part of the sweetener.
Rumors saying we don't want Michkov and others saying we will pick him. Hughes and Gorton seem to be playing everything close to the vest.
Ok, i'll bite... you need some explanation....We weren't talking "value", we were talking "BPA", you said trading down would be the best way to get BPA. Sure you could get "more value", or maybe more quantity, but you don't get a better BPA by trading down. Geez dude.
I'd pukeThat f kn better not happen -or the tv is crushed
Michkov has potential to be a franchise, even generational player.
Would you risk trading that for a much lesser player, a mid-late 1st round pick (likely bust or 4th liner) and a decent-ish player???
There’s a reason other fanbases asked for Slafkovsky/Suzuki+ for Montreal to go up just 1 spot when it’s a Big 5 prize. And we’re willing to trade down for magic beans? f*** off!
I just don’t like when people bring up hf posters like they’ve earned their stars. @WeThreeKings talks a big game but has never backed it up. His opinion is just that of opinion. Why do we care about what he says above others? Or give credit?
I think he tried to say that he thinks Habs are trading down if Michkov is still there at 5 and Fantilli/Smith/Carlsson are gone. And it came out weird as hell.I'm a francophone...but can somebody explain Leroux post to me...I have no idea what he's saying? lol
No of course not. But just because you see a potential Ovechkin, doesn't mean the team sees it the same way.Would you be happy trading a potential Ovechkin for Konecny + Leonard? I doubt it.
I just don’t like when people bring up hf posters like they’ve earned their stars. @WeThreeKings talks a big game but has never backed it up. His opinion is just that of opinion. Why do we care about what he says above others? Or give credit?
No. Because we're talking about the BPA. It doesn't matter if that player is ranked 5th or 8th. If you think the 8th ranked player is the BPA available, you don't trade down and risk that player being selected 6th or 7th if you only want BPA. You only do this to add VALUE. Montreal would trade down to add value/assets, not to select the BPA.Ok, i'll bite... you need some explanation....
BPA is a subjective construct. You decide who is the BPA and this may be different then the one another has. So... if you think you can take that BPA at a lower rank.... you trade down and get additional assets in the process = value for pick.
Bottom line is Habs draft either Mich - Leo- Smith - or they trade the pick