KelVarnsen
Registered User
Absolutely. The Ducks seem to try and take the "Safe" third liner upside pick more often than naught.Yeah, we don’t need more 3rd line upside picks, especially 33rd overall. I’d rather pick boom or bust here.
Absolutely. The Ducks seem to try and take the "Safe" third liner upside pick more often than naught.Yeah, we don’t need more 3rd line upside picks, especially 33rd overall. I’d rather pick boom or bust here.
That's possible. But we've also seen that go the other way.Ducks probably could have traded back and still gotten him.
Hopefully. Take a risk for god sake.I do think there is a big swing coming at 59 or 60. We shall see
I guess my issue is what kind of darts are they? Not all darts have the same value and the Ducks like to be too safe IMO.Verbeek is not going to trade any of the 2nd or 3rd rounders, he wants his darts.
They took swings on guys like LaCombe, Zellweger, Luneau, etc.I guess my issue is what kind of darts are they? Not all darts have the same value and the Ducks like to be too safe IMO.
I think that once you're outside the first round, the darts become pretty indistinguishible.I guess my issue is what kind of darts are they? Not all darts have the same value and the Ducks like to be too safe IMO.
5'11" 157. There's absolutely no wayKeep dropping sawchyn. Although at this point I doubt we take him anyway.
Ducks will almost certainly take a goalie with one of these picks. They better take someone with upside with the other pick
Nope. Im expecting some off the board pick of a dude thats like 6'3" and the word responsible in his description somewhere.5'11" 157. There's absolutely no way