forsbergavs32
Global Moderator
Last thread was getting full. Continue all of the sky is falling discussion here.
1.5M is not buriable.If they sign Tatar to a $1.5M contract, is it buriable without cap hit ?
The way I see the $2M available, is choosing to sign a $2M UFA now or trade for a $4M 50% retained guy at the deadline.
But I might be wrong. Can they do both and simply bury the $2M UFA if he sucks?
No benefit to that now, except laziness.Macdermid obviously sucks but one benefit is that they use him at F and D. This allows them to carry one less man on the roster most of the time.
Macdermid obviously sucks but one benefit is that they use him at F and D. This allows them to carry one less man on the roster most of the time.
Macdermid obviously sucks but one benefit is that they use him at F and D. This allows them to carry one less man on the roster most of the time.
I mean yeah that’s a plus, but then you’re still playing the worst player in the NHL in either case.Macdermid obviously sucks but one benefit is that they use him at F and D. This allows them to carry one less man on the roster most of the time.
Just carry Brad Hunt and be done with it, imo.Macdermid obviously sucks but one benefit is that they use him at F and D. This allows them to carry one less man on the roster most of the time.
McDermid should never play defense ever again. 4th line winger or enjoying nachos in the press box.
I agree, which is why I said I do not expect it to happen, but if CMac wants to be ruthless and get the most out of his roster he would do it.With the way the Avs can't accrue cap this season, there isn't a practical cap difference in carrying 21, 22, or 23 provided it fits under the cap in total. It makes a difference in cash flow and the highest dollar amount they could sign a single player to (IE sending down Dermy and Olofsson would allow up to ~3.7m spent on 1 player, but no extras).
People are dreaming if they really think Dermy will be sent down though or the Avs run under 21 consistently. Injuries happen so an extra or two are really needed and Avs are afraid of Dermy getting picked up on waivers.
I personally think it'll be over 40, probably well over. Injuries will happen and the Avs want to be grittier...I agree, which is why I said I do not expect it to happen, but if CMac wants to be ruthless and get the most out of his roster he would do it.
But I'm not expecting it to happen and I fully expect to see MacDermid suiting up for dozens of games this season.
I personally think it'll be over 40, probably well over. Injuries will happen and the Avs want to be grittier...
Grittier, you say?I personally think it'll be over 40, probably well over. Injuries will happen and the Avs want to be grittier...
MacDermid was ahead of Hunt in the food chain last season and played almost exclusively at defense. In fact I'm not even sure that he played one game at forward.
I don't see why it would change this upcoming season.
The Avs are f***ing morons if they are worried about MacDermid getting picked up on waivers.With the way the Avs can't accrue cap this season, there isn't a practical cap difference in carrying 21, 22, or 23 provided it fits under the cap in total. It makes a difference in cash flow and the highest dollar amount they could sign a single player to (IE sending down Dermy and Olofsson would allow up to ~3.7m spent on 1 player, but no extras).
People are dreaming if they really think Dermy will be sent down though or the Avs run under 21 consistently. Injuries happen so an extra or two are really needed and Avs are afraid of Dermy getting picked up on waivers.
I'd take him over DermyGrittier, you say?
That's not exactly a high bar to clear.I'd take him over Dermy