- May 4, 2004
- 5,616
- 18,152
And still managed a better p/pg rate than Hughes while being a quality PKer.Makar had a down year
I don't think Makar ever left. He just didn't care about the regular season, which is why he rightfully won't win this award.Hughes is winning this. Makar didn’t look like himself all season despite the point totals. Thrilled to see playoff Makar is back
Playing with a 140-point generational talent helps. Hughes was the Canucks’ number one driving force for offense. Absolute bonkers possession time.And still managed a better p/pg rate than Hughes
Yeah, playing with Miller and Pettersson was a total drag.Playing with a 140-point generational talent helps. Hughes was the Canucks’ number one driving force for offense.
Pettersson has been dreadful this season. It’s like the aliens from Space Jam came down to Vancouver and stole his mojo.Yeah, playing with Miller and Petterson was a total drag.
Pettersson has been dreadful this season. It’s like the aliens from Space Jam came down to Vancouver and stole his mojo.
His pk underlying numbers are in fact Trash just so you’re awareAnd still managed a better p/pg rate than Hughes while being a quality PKer.
He still had 89 pointsPettersson has been dreadful this season. It’s like the aliens from Space Jam came down to Vancouver and stole his mojo.
Cool. Hughes was better defenseman than Makar this season though, and that’s why Hughes is going to win the Norris. Better luck next year.He still had 89 points
Makar is the better defenseman.
Hughes is a 4th forward
they are the same type of defenseman. One had a great year, one had a down year. Makar's down year is still arguable for norris nomination, but he won't win it. Avs offense is driven by Mack, Canuck's is driven by Hughes.He still had 89 points
Makar is the better defenseman.
Hughes is a 4th forward