You know what I mean though. Bang for the buck, he sucks. Injuries on top of poor numbers on top of a disgusting about of money he makes. I don’t see anything positive at all. His defense has been solid yes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/495f1/495f185fc1f2d2bd459ec9ded3ca2eb67b513d95" alt="laugh :laugh: :laugh:"
You can't even stay consistent with your own argument. "you don't see anything positive at all" then immediately say he's been solid defensively.
And good god, you have to be purposefully, willfully, intentionally oblivious to say that he's had "poor numbers."
Last year he was probably at top 20 OF and top 2-3 CF in all of baseball. This year, yes he's not as good. But "not as good" George Springer is still
very good. Like still top 20 OF and probably top 7-8 in CF. I swear your entire argument about his offence sucking is based on the fact that he has a low(ish) batting average while he hits leadoff, which ignores that a) If you're going to pick one stat to hitch your wagon to when evaluating a player's impactful ability, batting average is probably the worst one not named "RBIs" and b) the idea that your leadoff man exists entirely to get on base (which you should be evaluating via OBP and not batting average since
that's explicitly what OBP is.) is narrow and misses the fact that players provide value in a lot of ways. Springer has been an MVP candidate almost exclusively hitting leadoff for his career. And that's fine. He's not less than simply for not being someone like the massively overrated Ben Revere.
Watching you argue a point is like listening to every random person that calls into Jays Talk after the game, 12 sheets to the wind, screaming that the day this franchise ruined its future
FOREVER was the time they traded Hank Blalock to the Rangers for Esteban Loaiza (for those of you following along, I know exactly what I wrote regarding this trade and the thing you're most likely looking at regarding it
was, in fact, intentional) and that this team needs to just make a bunch of random lopsided trades because he did them on his roster-updated copy of Ken Griffey Jr Baseball for the SNES and has won 10 world series in a row because of them.
You don't make cogent points. You don't even appear to try to make cogent points. And I'm not even sure if you're aware of how completely awful your arguments are because most of them look for all the world like they're little more than (possibly) drunken angry tantrums with all the self-awareness of a kid having a meltdown in the aisle of a Toys R Us because your mom promised you could have a toy after your doctor's appointment and you
don't want the GI Joe figure. You want the 5,000 piece Lego police station and don't care that it costs $200 because you
want it in the screechiest way possible.
Or... tl;dr