Northern Avs Fan
Registered User
- May 27, 2019
- 21,970
- 29,649
I think Lindholm is living off his reputation a bit.
The contract is fair.
The contract is fair.
Analytics guys don’t think the contract is a steal
Just like how he said Avs were in on Giroux? Friedman is a fraud
Hughes wants a 2023 1st (not 2022) and we have one.Starting to sour on Lehkonen. I think Habs will demand a huge overpayment.
Like I said in my other post, show me a trade Friedman or anyone else have called correctly so far. None of them.Everyone got played by Fletcher on that one. All the insiders are probably deleting a bunch of contacts now after getting burned.
I understand that this is a very important year for us with the UFA status of our entire second line. I know it's easy to get competitive seeing other teams add players and thinking "buy, buy, buy." But do we really think this is the last year of our window? Maybe we'll need that 2023 first-rounder to get something important at the next deadline?
Not saying that I necessarily think this way, but you know that Sakic is going to consider the value of that 2023 1st rounder for a future transaction. I think you can make a good case that spending it on, say, 1 playoff run of Andrew Copp isn't good asset management.
I think Lindholm is living off his reputation a bit.
The contract is fair.
Copp is an rfa and our window might not close but this year and the way the west looks is very clearly the best opportunity to make the finals. Our bottom 6 isn’t playoff capable, simple as that.
Why buy in? Couldn't tell you. But the Bruins have almost always gotten their way on contracts.He's never been a Bruin so why would he buy into "the Bruins way" when he can get at least that in UFA? Boston are also going to be the next SJ in a couple of years when Bergeron and Marchand retire.
Yeah, for the most part these analytics guys like JFresh will show how "bad" a player has been when the team is bad, and conversely how "good" a player has been when the team is good.I'm not a huge Lindholm fan, and that 8 year deal is a little scary, but these stat guys never realize the difference playing on a bad team versus a good team can have on your analytics.
Brandon Saad is the perfect example.
Like I said in my other post, show me a trade Friedman or anyone else have called correctly so far. None of them.
He speculated that Colorado and Toronto were working on something, and mentioned Jost's name. The next day Jost was traded to Minnesota. Could have just been a coincidence (and it was pretty obvious to everyone here that Jost was the logical piece to move), but it seems a bit like he had heard something from someone about Jost being shopped.Like I said in my other post, show me a trade Friedman or anyone else have called correctly so far. None of them.
They knew how much he wanted before trading for him. Not like Lindholm accepted less just because he became a Bruin.Why buy in? Couldn't tell you. But the Bruins have almost always gotten their way on contracts.
How did he get played by Florida? He got a 1st round pick and a top prospect. I'm not a huge fan of Tippett but he's clearly on the cusp of breaking into the NHL. He's shown he's too good for the AHL already.Fletcher played the media and then got played by Florida.
There's a good chance he could have gotten more as a UFA this summer from some team. Boston gets good contracts. Knowing his number doesn't change that fact.They knew how much he wanted before trading for him. Not like Lindholm accepted less just because he became a Bruin.
I'm not a huge Lindholm fan, and that 8 year deal is a little scary, but these stat guys never realize the difference playing on a bad team versus a good team can have on your analytics.
Brandon Saad is the perfect example.