East Coast Bias
Registered User
I’m also really intrigued by C. More so lately. Give Darnold another year. Load up on picks. Build the line. Take Sewell/Slater at 8/9. Take a C at 34. If Darnold sucks, you have all the pieces to make a move for your QB. I know people are saying next years draft sucks for QB but who knows. If I told you Wilson would be #2 last summer you’d call me insane.
To expand on this.
Denver offers the 9th plus next years 1st and more.
Between the run on WR/TE plus QB, you're probably looking at either Slater or Sewell at 9.
If not, you're looking at Smith/Waddle because someone took an OT and left a pass catcher.
Next year you have Denver's 1st. KC is great, SD and Oakland could be sneaky good. Anyone surprised if Denver is the 4th best team in the AFC West?
So you're looking at what, at worst 15 next year? More likely 8-12.
Seattle could easily miss the playoffs. They were not close to as good as their record this year. SF will be better. Rams will be better. Arizona is good.
So you could potentially have something like a top 6 pick (Jets), 9-12 (Denver) and 14-18 (Seattle) next year. Very plausible.