No one is trading a first rounder for Engram. I think you’re looking at a 3rd and maybe even a 4th depending on his contract situation.
Id be shocked if Joe took Etienne at 23. He’s been all about value picks and acquiring additional picks as well as value contracts. I think they’ll take a RB at some point, but would be floored if it was 23. I’d put smart money on a CB and wouldn’t be surprised if he traded down and/or went OL.
Ive never been a Davis guy. The guys I wanted were never available in Robinson or Goodwin. Juju is massively overrated. Is Golladay twice as good as Davis? He got twice as much money. I don’t think so. Am I psyched about Davis? Not really, but given the options, he was probably the best choice. If nothing else, he’s a far superior option to Perriman. I also think Cole could be a smart under the radar signing.
I think you’re reading too far into it. I’m not even sure Douglass knows what he’s doing at QB yet.
Those OL were never coming here. They would’ve had to be massively overpaid. Douglass hasn’t shown that he does that. He seems to like younger guys on shorter term deals. Those decisions had already been worked out with guy like Thuney to KC.
I’ll throw another angle at you. Maybe they hold Darnold to the draft. If no one pays up for 2 then they take Wilson. If someone ponies up with a Herculean offer then they take the capital and give Sam another opportunity. If you move Sam for a 2nd or 3rd today then you lock yourself into Wilson. The one thing I cant see them doing is trading Sam, then trading the pick, and selecting more of a project like Lance and/or going the journeyman route. I think they realize the fan base would riot and it would set the team further back.
It's just a hunch about Joe taking Etienne or Harris there if either/or are starting at us. I know if I were the GM and saw potential difference making RB's like either or those two and I had a ton of draft picks in my pocket especially if I trade down from #2, I personally take the dive and take Etienne or Harris.
I get it's not convetional but Jets need to think outside of the box and either of those two RB's in a Mike Lafleur based offensive system I'm convinced would flourish. Besides since Curtis Martin left the scene, when was the last time the Jets had a RB that scared the crap out of an opposing defense? Exactly none. It's time...Jets need an explosive RB. I hope and pray Joe does. If he doesn't, I'll be OK with it but I do think it would be a mistake. Get Etienne or Harris...that would be fun and very exciting to look forward to.
Couple of things:
No way on gods green earth is Douglas taking a QB and sticking with Darnold as well. That just aint happening IMO. That would be a terrible move. If you draft a Wilson and stick at #2, you trade Darnold for whatever you can get and bring in a veteran I dunno like an Alex Smith type. But no way do you have both a stud rookie QB and Darnold at same time.
I don't think it's going to even matter cause I do think we are trading down...I'm feeling almost positive about it as I said, and I think we are sticking with Sam for one more "show me what you got with better weapons and and improved O-line and better coaching" year and if doesn't show mucho improvement...he's gone. What will be interesting is if and it's obviously a big if, if Sam does show to be the kind of QB we were all hoping he'd be, what kind of money would he command next year as his rookie contract is up.
I hope that would be the kind of problem Douglas would have cause that would mean the Jets are on the right track and were beginning to be a relevant football team again...here's to hoping.
Make this happen and its been an offseason for the ages. And we havent even reached the draft yet.
There were also some unconfirmed rumors of Giants interest in Clowney.
Too many Giants fans were worried needlessly about the cap situation. Gettleman has found plenty to do seriously good things this offseason.
Its generally considered a poor value taking a RB in round 1. Joe is all about value.
Add to that, the Shanahan system uses multiple RB’s and usually multiple cheaply acquired RB’s and I just don’t see it. That system doesn’t seem to go the old fashioned Curtis Martin bell cow way. I’d expect they have a few different RB’s with different styles who they deploy based on matchups.
To me a 1st round RB or TE is a luxury pick and the Jets still have a myriad of holes. Unless Etienne becomes a Kamara or a Christian McCaffrey then it’s poor value.
It would have been so Jets if they traded for Watson right before the lawsuits.
Id be shocked if Joe took Etienne at 23. He’s been all about value picks and acquiring additional picks as well as value contracts. I think they’ll take a RB at some point, but would be floored if it was 23. I’d put smart money on a CB and wouldn’t be surprised if he traded down and/or went OL.
Not at 23, but I wouldn't be shocked at 34.
Can anyone explain the Giants cap? I thought Golladay put them against the limit.
Gettlemans computer guys are doing a helluva job. They can really do anything they want at the draft now.
I’m really intrigued by Rousseau.
Can anyone explain the Giants cap? I thought Golladay put them against the limit.