Sm00chy
Registered User
- Sep 29, 2017
- 883
- 1,208
Whoa... your value for Chychrun is wayyyy off.OEL, Keller, soderstrom, schmaltz and a 1st for Eichel.
chychrun, Hayton and a 2nd for Tkachuk.
Whoa... your value for Chychrun is wayyyy off.OEL, Keller, soderstrom, schmaltz and a 1st for Eichel.
chychrun, Hayton and a 2nd for Tkachuk.
k y'all how out to lunch am I?
Keller 7.15 Eichel 10 Garland 5.25
Schwartz 5.5 Dvorak 4.45 Hornqvist 5.3
DeBrusk 3.675 Bozak 2.75 Pitlick 1.75
Crouse 1.533 Larsson 1.4 Bunting 1.5
Gabriel 1
Chychrun 4.6 Hamilton 8.5
Vaakanainen 0.9 Goligoski 2.0
Oleksiak 4.0 Lyubushkin 1.35
Capobianco 0.8
Hill 1.8
Anderson 3.0
Still not a ton of skill or overwhelming size but there are are a lot of industrious and irritating players.
- Schmaltz, Hayton, Kuemper, 2021 2nd, 2022 1st for Eichel
- OEL for DeBrusk, Vaakanainen
- Kessel for Hornqvist (Florida has been on his list)
- Fischer to Seattle
- Couple of Blues UFAs added up front, then Hamilton, Oleksiak, Andersen
- Still roughly 2 mil cap space
Eichel move aside, I feel blowing the doors off for Hamilton has to be the biggest stretch.
Kessel for Hornqvist (Florida has been on his list)
Where is Soderstrom in that scenario?I mean, this would be an outstanding offseason.
Probably in the Eichel deal. Soderstrom and hoping the Coyotes dive bomb so their first is high is the only real value in that deal. The rest are nice parts but really don't move the needle for Eichel.Where is Soderstrom in that scenario?
Would rather ride out the last year of Kessel's contract than picking up the extra year of an older Hornqvist, especially considering he is currently under producing Kessel on a better team.
I wonder if BA looks at Phil as a cap dump to be able reallocate the money to a player he wants. RNH? Landeskog? Somethings a bit strange with Landeskog being unsigned when they started talking in the fall...Yeah, that's a tough one to figure out. Pretty limited no-trade list and historically he's rigged it to include teams who wouldn't want him to really minimize the team's options.
Yeah, that's a tough one to figure out. Pretty limited no-trade list and historically he's rigged it to include teams who wouldn't want him to really minimize the team's options.
Phil would fetch much more than a 4th if they decide to move him.I wonder if BA looks at Phil as a cap dump to be able reallocate the money to a player he wants. RNH? Landeskog? Somethings a bit strange with Landeskog being unsigned when they started talking in the fall...
I wonder if we would sign a top FA, then ship Phil for a 4th... BA seems very excited about this offseason, I think he has some big ideas.
My dream is Phil to FLA for Vlad Kolyachonok and John Ludvig. Our D pool is very shallow after Soderstrom. I like these two prospects an awful lot. And they’re a whole closer to the NHL than 2021 picks.Phil would fetch much more than a 4th if they decide to move him.
More just illustrating a point that BA may not really care what the return is. He wants to reallocate the money.Phil would fetch much more than a 4th if they decide to move him.
Lets assume Phil will wave. I think we get a cap dump back for him as part of the deal. At his age and his salary, nobody wants the cap hit, cap space is gold. We unload a goal scorer for not as much talent back and we get a cap dump so we don't save much either.More just illustrating a point that BA may not really care what the return is. He wants to reallocate the money.
And like Mosby said Phil has a near impossible NMC.
These vets could be all gone: Demers/Hjam/Goose/Brassard. That leaves OEL/Kessel. I could see Kessel being moved but for a cap dump back, maybe a vet leader BA wants. OEL has the NMC, I doubt he waves again.I still think Army wants to nuke the leadership/veteran group of this team. We've heard before how the young players look up to Kessel, but maybe Army doesn't like that. Playing poker and eating hotdogs all day and also being a 30-goal scorer is definitely not the norm.
I don’t think Phil is as un-tradable as some of you guys think. He did manage to score 20 goals in a shortened season on an offensively challenged team. He has 1 year left on his contract and I believe he’s getting a 5 mill bonus and then a 1 million base salary. Of course the cap hit can be tough to fit in these days, but Phil raised his value this season.
Interesting.Phil made it pretty clear in the exit interviews that he expects to not be in AZ.
The problem is he can control his destination, limiting his value.
They'd probably give Kassian to you for a 4th rounder.I would try to get Kassian from the Oil for Schmaltz, we need muscle that can play a little, might have to eat some salary but number 8 needs to go unless Keller gets punted to another team.
Why are we so eager to give up our top goal scorer for middling value? Might as well keep him, unless the team is purposely tanking, of course.
That would be worth it, but we are still stuck with Schmaltz.They'd probably give Kassian to you for a 4th rounder.
So? You’re not very good at asset management.That would be worth it, but we are still stuck with Schmaltz.
Dont think dumping Kessel for another aging vet helps the team much.Lets assume Phil will wave. I think we get a cap dump back for him as part of the deal. At his age and his salary, nobody wants the cap hit, cap space is gold. We unload a goal scorer for not as much talent back and we get a cap dump so we don't save much either.
Other than just wanting Phil out of the locker room, I don't see us benefitting much in a trade.