2020/21 Roster Thread

[Striiker]

Ah I see, so basically the so called bandwagon is there committing all those fallacies while tucson from your bandwagon is just using hyperbole and presenting rhetorical points

Defending tucson posts might literally be the worst hill to die on, in all of history.

This is the the most concentrated form of contrarianism that's ever existed.

 

[Beef Invictus]

I don't buy it at all. It's very convenient to criticize a coach and then when he has success retroactively explain it away as he "changed." I guarantee that if you talked to these coaches they would laugh at the suggestion that they undertook some kind of substantial magical change.

What, I should ignore when a coach adjusts their methods?

I guarantee they wouldn't, and would probably be pleased that someone noticed their work at improvement.

 

[kudymen]

Defending tucson posts might literally be the worst hill to die on, in all of history.

This is the the most concentrated form of contrarianism that's ever existed.

A job is a job

 

[Ghosts Beer]

Ah I see, so basically the so called bandwagon is there committing all those fallacies while tucson from your bandwagon is just using hyperbole and presenting rhetorical points

"Your bandwagon"???? Lmao. You don't understand the concept of bandwagon.

 

[Beef Invictus]

Tortorella is an interesting coach because he tweaks how his team plays depending on his roster, annually. When the skill level is higher he happily opens things up, but God f***ing help anyone watching if the talent level in a year isn't there because he locks it all down into a grinding slog.

But I guess these obvious changes don't actually exist lol

 

[kudymen]

The irony in your post -- criticizing posters for not always following the board's popular opinion -- surely is lost.

I pointed out inclination of that group to often join up in contrarianism just for the sake of doing it, hardly criticized. And as presented on the previous page, "irony" is hardly exclusive to me on the past few pages.

 

[Starat327]

I pointed out inclination of that group to often join up in contrarianism just for the sake of doing it, hardly criticized. And as presented on the previous page, "irony" is hardly exclusive to me on the past few pages.

You're wasting your time.

 

[kudymen]

You're wasting your time.

Once in a month I am curious about the lengths to which it is possible to go and the amount of creativity that can be shown

 

[Starat327]

Once in a month I am curious about the lengths to which it is possible to go and the amount of creativity that can be shown

The lengths are endless. The creativity is minimal.

The end.

 

[Magua]

I pointed out inclination of that group to often join up in contrarianism just for the sake of doing it, hardly criticized. And as presented on the previous page, "irony" is hardly exclusive to me on the past few pages.

It's hard to read this. I'll let the master himself explain how I feel about you.

 

[Starat327]

It's hard to read this. I'll let the master himself explain how I feel about you.

WHAT?

 

[kudymen]

It's hard to read this. I'll let the master himself explain how I feel about you.

I dont know that avatar.. Must have been met with Igor Silent quite quickly after the first occurence

 

[Ghosts Beer]

I pointed out inclination of that group to often join up in contrarianism just for the sake of doing it, hardly criticized. And as presented on the previous page, "irony" is hardly exclusive to me on the past few pages.

Boy, want to talk about a logical fallacy. Assuming people who disagree with the majority are doing it just for the sake of being "contrarian" is a great one.

 

[kudymen]

Boy, want to talk about a logical fallacy. Assuming people who disagree with the majority are doing it just for the sake of being "contrarian" is a great one.

Boy, you could be on to something if it were an occasional occurence and not a regular one, going on for years.

 

[Striiker]

Boy, you could be on to something if it were an occasional occurence and not a regular one, going on for years.

Literally just three examples of many, but easily enough to prove that someone is just being a contrarian. Nobody else could possibly believe all three of these things and argue them so often.

-Hak is a good and smart coach
-Hagg is good and Ghost is bad
-Stewart is good and NAK is bad

 

[kudymen]

Literally just three examples of many, but easily enough to prove that someone is just being a contrarian. Nobody else could possible believe all three of these things and argue them so often.

-Hak is a good and smart coach
-Hagg is good and Ghost is bad
-Stewart is good and NAK is bad

I am just glad that this hasnt happened very recently:

 

[TheLegendkiller]

It's hard to read this. I'll let the master himself explain how I feel about you.

When I see posts like this, I like to guess what part of Philly this person is from .

 

[sigma six]

When I see posts like this, I like to guess what part of Philly this person is from .

Philly has an area full of jacked-up Dodges?

 

[LegionOfDoom91]

It's hard to read this. I'll let the master himself explain how I feel about you.

Reminds me of this meme lol.

 

[Chinatown88]

So offerseet Cernak, con Armstrong for a Parayko deal? Everyone agree? Good.

 

[DancingPanther]

Yes. Yes yes.

@DancingPanther how about Lundqvist?

f*** him. I'm 16-4 in my last 20 chess matches and I'd f***ing wipe the board with his face too. Shove a rook up his ass for good measure

 

[LegionOfDoom91]

How fitting that the person most guilty of this on this board used to live in Texas.

 

[Ghosts Beer]

Boy, you could be on to something if it were an occasional occurence and not a regular one, going on for years.

Do you think this board is the center of the Flyers’ fan universe? I call it as I see it. Sometimes it’s unpopular on this board full of young Corsi worshippers, sometimes I agree with the majority. The “you disagree only for the sake of being contrarian” argument is lazy & fallacious. I could just as lazily contend, “you only agree for the sake of herd membership.”

 

[DancingPanther]

Yes. Yes yes.

@DancingPanther how about Lundqvist?

I had to edit this with right alignment for maximum effectiveness. This is not a joking matter. If Fletcher makes a play for this guy I swear to god I'll sharpen and fire the pitchforks until they glow

 

[Tripod]

So offerseet Cernak, con Armstrong for a Parayko deal? Everyone agree? Good.

Expansion stops this from being a possibility.