Boston Bandit
Registered User
- Aug 2, 2005
- 3,937
- 9,000
No doubt, which makes trading him hard on a personal level. I just think it makes too much sense based on what they need and what they have waiting on LD.That opportunity would really need to be unique. I'd say those comments come across that Krug is going to be re-signed more than he's going to be traded. The feeling is mutual between organization/player. They love each other.
Every damn summer this comes up.
Could they? Sure.
It already isI cannot believe that Karlsson deal.
That's going to look real bad for SJ soon.
According to this article: No
What’s the difference between Ferland and Wagner?
They seemed to figure it out in the playoffs, where they were over 88%.Forget any players, I want this team to fix their damn PK. 79.9% is unacceptable.
I want them to build on it because the short handed breakaways they gave up all year simply can't happen.They seemed to figure it out in the playoffs, where they were over 88%.
This was just posted on TSN regarding Sweeney's comments on David Backes:
"Boston Bruins general manager Don Sweeney appeared to rule out the possibility of buying out forward David Backes this off-season on Monday.
“He’s a part of our hockey club,” Sweeney said of the 35-year-old who appeared in four games during the Stanley Cup Final.
Sweeney added that he envisions Backes in a bottom-six role moving forward on a checking line.
Backes, who scored seven goals and posted 20 points in 70 games this season, is signed for two more seasons at a $6 million cap hit. He dressed in 15 games during the postseason, scoring two goals and adding five points.
A veteran of 928 career NHL games, Backes has 244 goals and 551 points with the Bruins and St. Louis Blues.
I agree with you 100%Want no part of Ferland. We’ve blown enough money on broken down senior citizens for big money contracts.
Brandon Tanev is intriguing.
As is my my old fave Thomas Vanek (yes, he’s old but could be had for cheap) and he can still be effective.
I agree with you 100%
Ferlund is enticing but reminds me of a better fighting Beleskey
He’s going to be movedI think we can survive Backes this year, but I'm hoping we can get him da **** outta here by next offseason.
Want no part of Ferland. We’ve blown enough money on broken down senior citizens for big money contracts.
Brandon Tanev is intriguing.
As is my my old fave Thomas Vanek (yes, he’s old but could be had for cheap) and he can still be effective.
Dumba?Get me matt D. Pronto.
If the Bruins deal Krejci and his 71 points because so many Bruins fans on twitter are butt hurt I’ll be disappointed but the silver lining is I’ll be free all of next May to work on my yardThe problem with Krejci is that only contending teams will want him but they will only want to give up futures which doesn't help us. No rebuilding or up-and-coming team will give up a solid roster player for a 30+ forward.
The only team that might make sense to me is Carolina but they would want to send a D back. So then we would need to have something else in play to get a young center from somewhere else. Basically my point is trading Krejci will just create a hole that is expensive to fill.
Want no part of Ferland. We’ve blown enough money on broken down senior citizens for big money contracts.
Brandon Tanev is intriguing.
As is my my old fave Thomas Vanek (yes, he’s old but could be had for cheap) and he can still be effective.
If the Bruins deal Krejci and his 71 points because so many Bruins fans on twitter are butt hurt I’ll be disappointed but the silver lining is I’ll be free all of next May to work on my yard