Barzal or Connor do not improve this team?
I like you crass, but you don't get to say Dean traded Barzal or Connor while continuing to say that Blake wasn't going to trade nice assets for Patches.
We don't know for sure who the Kings were going to pick. We don't know for sure what the Kings offer was for Patches. If you are going to use this reasoning on Patches, you can't ignore it with the Lucic pick.
As for the DL/Blake stuff: I love DL. I don't like Blake. That being said, I don't think I'd be really pumped on DL being the GM again nor am I advocating for Blake to be fired right now. If the goal is to be bad this year, please keep Blake in place.
Dean f***ed up a lot. Actually, his tenure is like a sandwich made out of shit for the bread but with amazing meat in the middle. His beginning was bad and the end was really bad. He was given his five year plan and actually won in year five; however, his rebuild began with Kopitar/Brown/Quick already in place. He missed on his first rebuild draft pick with Hickey but made up for it a year later with Doughty.
Blake's been shit so far at the beginning as well. Might have also missed on a high first rounder in Vilardi. Wrong coaching hire, like Lombardi. Bad UFA signing just like Lombardi when he signed Blake himself. I guess he thing I'm wondering with Blake and his signing of T-Mac for five years: has AEG given him the green light for his own five year plan that started with last year's draft? I'm thinking that might be the case but Dean just flat-out said it since there weren't a bunch of bandwagon fans to lose whereas Luc and AEG would like to keep holding on to the new fans they acquired during the Cup years. To say the plan is for five years is rough as opposed to kind of hinting at playoff contention next season when, in reality, it is the 2022 season.
Back to Blake v. Dean: Dean tanked and won an amazing prize in Doughty. He also already had Kopitar and Quick. Blake is going to need to nab an elite player in this draft and he knows it. If he can get an elite guy this year and a decent number of the higher-end prospects pan out, then Blake will be cooking with gas. 8 and 11 will still be good NHL players and they will have cap space to augment the roster further. This is where I am concerned. What happens then? I have no issues with Blake continuing to run this team when the whole point is to draft high and well: the track record for Lombardi's scouts in the 1st/2nd round is pretty good and they appear to have done well so far. It's just how much faith do I have in him to make a winning stew once he has most of the ingredients? Based on things so far, the answer is not much. I feel like he's going to have a lot of time to get smarter and better though because it appears he is here for the long haul. Anybody clamoring for his firing is probably going to be waiting for a long time.