2019-20 Kings News/Rumors

Status
Not open for further replies.

KingsFan7824

Registered User
Dec 4, 2003
19,528
7,603
Visit site
You had time in the case of Carter to send him to a contender for a late first round pick and a very good prospect as the 2017 trade deadline approached. It was obvious at that point the Kings were done being a legit contender, and Carter was still producing. Carter has a very cap friendly contract and GMs who are in a position to win a Stanley Cup add that piece at the deadline and go for it.

I think we'll just always disagree on this. He was 32 at the 2017 deadline, with 5 more years on his contract. Guys like that don't tend to get traded, they don't tend to bring a lot back in a deal if they are traded, and they don't tend to get dealt at the deadline if they're traded. Muzzin didn't even bring back a very good prospect, and he was younger, less expensive, locked in for only 1 additional season, and played as important a position.

Even June 2015 was probably too late to trade him, and that's assuming Lombardi ever had that kind of thought in his head at the time.

You look at other deals around the league at deadline time, and very few involve a 32 year old with 5 years left. You can throw Phaneuf in there. 31, with a bunch of years left, but he did not bring back a 1st, or a good prospect, for Toronto.

If we knew that Carter was even made available at the 2017 deadline, that would probably help any discussion about his value at the 2017 deadline. But you don't see too many guys in his situation traded for value, because of exactly what's happened to him since the 2017 deadline. Same reason you never want to give out the long contracts to old guys. If you get hurt, or your production goes down, it's much more difficult to get back to full health, or to get back to the production that made you valuable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rusty Batch

Statto

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 9, 2014
5,701
8,060
If we trade Doughty, in 2 years the kids will then be ready for a run a couple of years later. I guarantee I’d go insane reading post after post with people complaining that trading Doughty was a big mistake and that keeping him would have been the difference. If we add Doughty to the team we’d be serious contenders etc. All whilst Doughty lifts a couple more cups wherever he ends up.

Doughty is the least of our problems, we’d regret moving him no matter what we get for him.
 

Steve Zissou

I'll order you a red cap and a Speedo.
Feb 3, 2006
7,470
10,380
City of Angels
Hey, it's not like we just traded for this:

51mrcFQR9%2BL._SX358_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg


* Lost a 1st in a deep draft
* Signed him and his broken body to $92 million deal while he's already showing the cracks in his game for the past 2 years
* And most of all the team is already looking like they are missing the post season
 

No Name The Nameless

Registered User
Feb 15, 2019
1,362
1,149
Tornado Alley
If we trade Doughty, in 2 years the kids will then be ready for a run a couple of years later. I guarantee I’d go insane reading post after post with people complaining that trading Doughty was a big mistake and that keeping him would have been the difference. If we add Doughty to the team we’d be serious contenders etc. All whilst Doughty lifts a couple more cups wherever he ends up.

Doughty is the least of our problems, we’d regret moving him no matter what we get for him.
Saying DD is the least of our problems is like closing your eyes and going lalalala. He has been a problem. He may not be playing BAD, but he's not been good. When your veteran, team leader, one of the highest paid players in the sport is not giving it his all and complaining to the media that makes him a big problem.

His expectations are higher. His salary is higher. He has to bring it up in order to justify the loss in equity he carries.
 
Last edited:

Rusty Batch

Registered User
Sep 22, 2010
987
521
Doughty is a defenseman and he's second on our team in scoring. And scoring isn't even his strength. He's an excellent puck mover and aggressive defensively.

People need to be realistic with just how awful this supporting cast is surrounding Kopitar and Doughty.

Blaming them is weird imo. They are two way players that play in every brutal situation surrounded by ahl caliber players.

Good news is we have one of the deepest prospect pools in the league. I'm confident this will turn around within two years. If it doesn't then we really blew it in the last few drafts.
 

KingsFan7824

Registered User
Dec 4, 2003
19,528
7,603
Visit site
Lombardi had to gut the future to trade for players to fill the holes on the team to win when expectations were raised, and then couldn't draft enough quality players later to fill the holes left by the guys who had been traded for who had to leave due to the cap, age, or whatever. That's how you end up with large contracts and no depth.
 

kings11

Registered User
Sep 29, 2011
6,311
4,127
Las Vegas
the Kings biggest problem is Carter, he is a fringe NHLer at this point

I'll take this as you being disappointed with this season and sucking overall, but lets get one thing clear... Jeff Carter is still a good NHL player... overpaid salary hit wise but still good..
 

johnjm22

Pseudo Intellectual
Aug 2, 2005
21,026
17,973
The Kings biggest problem is they don't have very many good players.

While the farm is deep, it's unlikely that our prospects make a significant impact in the NHL soon. By the time they do, our current good players will probably be aged out, and the cycle of suck will continue.

It's gonna be a long time folks.
 

Bandit

Registered User
Jul 23, 2005
33,068
23,406
Unemployed in Greenland
the Kings biggest problem is Carter, he is a fringe NHLer at this point
Nah, the Kings biggest problem is that they just don't have much talent beyond Kopitar & Doughty, yet people still expect them to be good for reasons that flounder somewhere between denial and mental illness.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad