KingsFan7824
Registered User
You had time in the case of Carter to send him to a contender for a late first round pick and a very good prospect as the 2017 trade deadline approached. It was obvious at that point the Kings were done being a legit contender, and Carter was still producing. Carter has a very cap friendly contract and GMs who are in a position to win a Stanley Cup add that piece at the deadline and go for it.
I think we'll just always disagree on this. He was 32 at the 2017 deadline, with 5 more years on his contract. Guys like that don't tend to get traded, they don't tend to bring a lot back in a deal if they are traded, and they don't tend to get dealt at the deadline if they're traded. Muzzin didn't even bring back a very good prospect, and he was younger, less expensive, locked in for only 1 additional season, and played as important a position.
Even June 2015 was probably too late to trade him, and that's assuming Lombardi ever had that kind of thought in his head at the time.
You look at other deals around the league at deadline time, and very few involve a 32 year old with 5 years left. You can throw Phaneuf in there. 31, with a bunch of years left, but he did not bring back a 1st, or a good prospect, for Toronto.
If we knew that Carter was even made available at the 2017 deadline, that would probably help any discussion about his value at the 2017 deadline. But you don't see too many guys in his situation traded for value, because of exactly what's happened to him since the 2017 deadline. Same reason you never want to give out the long contracts to old guys. If you get hurt, or your production goes down, it's much more difficult to get back to full health, or to get back to the production that made you valuable.