GDT: 2018 WJC • Game 03 • Group A: CAN (4) - FIN (2) F

[TimeZone]

Is Canada THAT fast or is Finland THAT slow?

 

[jj cale]

Beautiful goal all as a result of metes skating.

3-1 I am just falling more in love with Batherson with each passing game.

 

[Dr Pepper]

Was also ruled a goal on ice. It wasn't a mistake, it was a good goal.

The net came off before the puck went in. Simple.

Is there some unknown rule about "intent of the puck", that they used to say it was going to go in anyway?

 

[Classicnamesup]

Does they allow that goal?

Think they will allow that one?

 

[6ix]

Canada is so bad.

LOL

 

[CantLoseWithMatthews]

Canada back up by 2. We're the better team in my opinion

 

[Dodospice]

Nothing Hart could do on that goal.

 

[Confucius]

We have ourself a game. Guy cleared it right to open guy.

Lasted 2 minutes

 

[y2kcanucks]

Yeah, you clearly have a strong grasp of the rules.

Yup, apparently I do since the officials agree with me.

 

[ponder]

Make-up non-call there on the Finland goal, as the Finn had a key Canadian defender in a headlock on the goal, in a super obvious way in front of the net, with no call. Terrible reffing so far, but I’m OK with it sort of evening out there.

 

[DoingItCoolKiwi]

What a pass

 

[hamzarocks]

nice play by mete there, nice puck carrying skills.

 

[Arto Kilponen]

There is a quite new rule, that the goal counts if the puck is already making its way across the line in the moment the net is displaced. Plus, if the movement of the net doesn't affect the movement of the puck.

Ok, well, I would anyway believe that as they video reviewed the goal (and there's not some idiot Swede checking the goal - ask John Tortorella what I mean), it has to be the right call.

This similar rule is at least in floorball where the big difference is that game is not stopped when net is dislocated and if ball goes to where goal was _supposed_ to be, that's a goal, so I can believe there is similar rule in ice hockey.

But regardless of the rules, it think it was fair that it was a goal. Post -> leg of goalie -> net. Should count by common sense.

What I wonder here the most is that was that the reason it was challenged, because I really think at least someone from Finnish coaching staff should know the rules.

 

[Tralfamadore]

Finland D sucks.

 

[Critical13]

#UnleashERasanen

Finnish D looks absolutely horrid

 

[Stive Morgan]

Mete showing off those wheels

 

[y2kcanucks]

The net came off before the puck went in. Simple.

Is there some unknown rule about "intent of the puck", that they used to say it was going to go in anyway?

Apparently there is.

 

[hellstick]

Beauty pass by Gadjovich.

 

[TheFinnishTrap]

Constant 3-2 situations. Not good.

 

[King Weber]

Luukkonen should get pulled

 

[Jarey Curry]

Luck has nothing to do with that.

It's a coin toss basically. And the reason something like that is allowed to be a coin toss is on IIHF. They think it's okay if net is loose, if atleast the puck crosses the line.

 

[Chainshot]

UPL needs more help on that one.

 

[Hockeyisl1fe]

What is this?? Defending is absolutely atrocious.

 

[kunekune]

Because the puck itself was going in anyway, and the net being dislodged had no affect on whether or not that puck was going in.

That is NOT the rule if the offensive player displaces the puck.

That rule only matters if defending player displaces the net.

Read the rules again...

 

[CantLoseWithMatthews]

Canada is so bad.

Oh is that right