Anthony5967
Registered User
I think Anisimov might be closer comparison:
I'm confused. You saying Kravtsov's comparable to Anisimov in terms of talent and potential?
I think Anisimov might be closer comparison:
I'm confused. You saying Kravtsov's comparable to Anisimov in terms of talent and potential?
Let's not pretend Kravtsov is a player who never delivers a check. He doesn't fly around like a headless chicken hitting every player all the time, but he battles for the puck like every other player
More similar in what way?no I am saying he seems more similar to Anisimov than Kovalev.
I halfway agree. The only prospect that will make/break this is Kakko, but Kravtsov would be a significant loss—especially compared to Andersson—because he’s actually good.My point wasn't to compare the two. Given the draft capital expended, I'd argue BOTH would sting if they don't pan out.
However, it takes more than one prospect to build a hockey team.
Lias + Kravtsov both failing would be pretty devastating though. And I don't even want to think about Kakko. I've argued to be patient with him, so I won't even bring up 3 straight 1st rd. fails...
Ironically his linemate Strome has done the complete opposite.Buch has come a long way from where he was when he first got here, and he was older when he got here than Kravtsov was. I'm sure Panarin and Buch talk a lot.
Honestly, many of our players could learn by watching Panarin, not just the Russian kids. None of them have Panarin's skill or brain, but they can emulate his work ethic and his play away from the puck. They can watch Mika too.
Are we judging make it or break it for the team based on our expectations or based on capital expended? Arguably Andersson cost more(ie higher pick), plus as he was a year earlier his presence now "should" be more helpful. Imagine if we had an amazing bottom 6 to match our top 2 lines.I halfway agree. The only prospect that will make/break this is Kakko, but Kravtsov would be a significant loss—especially compared to Andersson—because he’s actually good.
Meh it was a small pick difference and not a great 1st round in 2017. It’s also the factor of whiffing on consecutive top picks. I expected that to happen at least once during the rebuild, but two in a row is not good. If we didn’t luck out on Kakko (who hasn’t been great either...), Kravtsov busting would absolutely kill or delay the rebuild.Are we judging make it or break it for the team based on our expectations or based on capital expended? Arguably Andersson cost more(ie higher pick), plus as he was a year earlier his presence now "should" be more helpful. Imagine if we had an amazing bottom 6 to match our top 2 lines.
I do agree on Kakko. A #2 overall not becoming a stud would be devastating. But we know non-generational talents take time...
Are we judging make it or break it for the team based on our expectations or based on capital expended? Arguably Andersson cost more(ie higher pick), plus as he was a year earlier his presence now "should" be more helpful. Imagine if we had an amazing bottom 6 to match our top 2 lines.
I do agree on Kakko. A #2 overall not becoming a stud would be devastating. But we know non-generational talents take time...
I'd love to see them experiment a little with him at center next year like they had alluded to a bit when they drafted him
Rather they just keep him where he's at while he hopefully developes into the player they expect him to be.No reason to start moving him around and put extra pressure on himI'd love to see them experiment a little with him at center next year like they had alluded to a bit when they drafted him
This makes zero sense. Why do some on this board have an obsession with shoehorning players into center?I'd love to see them experiment a little with him at center next year like they had alluded to a bit when they drafted him
This makes zero sense. Why do some on this board have an obsession with shoehorning players into center?
Did they? Kravtsov only really played center out of necessity for the u20 NT in his D+1 year. I hope they use their prospects to the best of their abilities instead of moving them out of position.
Rather they just keep him where he's at while he hopefully developes into the player they expect him to be.No reason to start moving him around and put extra pressure on him
I was gonna say some smart-ass shit but I won'tThis makes zero sense. Why do some on this board have an obsession with shoehorning players into center?
This makes zero sense. Why do some on this board have an obsession with shoehorning players into center?
it is apparent that his only chance to make the Rangers is as a goalie.
Pretty interesting hearing this from Kovy. Very insightful, even if he doesn't have specific knowledge of Kravtsov himself. Kovy must have learned a lot over his career.So Kovalev was recently named HC of the Kunlun Red Star. I was reading about that on twitter and went down the rabbit hole.
GK: New York Rangers prospect Vitali Kravtsov has made big news lately. He was sent down to Hartford and decided to exercise a clause in his contract that allowed him to return to Traktor Chelyabinsk. It has sparked a debate over whether an NHL prospect better develops in the AHL versus the KHL.
SF: It’s a unique situation—I do not know Vitaly well as a player or a person. I know what they’re debating: he was not willing to stay in the system, to go on the buses for 10-12 hours. Where were his agents and parents to set expectations? Did he think that he was going to the New York Rangers’ top two lines? He could be a top-six forward, but if you look at the roster, there are already 27 or 28 players. Where do you fit? That’s where agents need to come in to set expectations. You have to talk to the kid like an adult. Obviously Vitali has great potential, but I have seen a lot of great young talents where nothing happens.
I think we have to wait and see. It’s possible he will get more ice time [here], and will develop in a year or so to play in the NHL. But again, he left the system of the Rangers. It is going to be up to him. He needs a plan now. I’m telling you, he needs a plan every game. He chose to come back and play for his home team, which has really struggled. Russian fans welcome that. American fans, probably not — they think that in the North American system, he can learn quicker (smaller ice size and so on). That is true too. We have to wait and see. Hopefully, he becomes a KHL star—but now, I think he has to stay here until 24 or 25 years old. He does not need to go back earlier than that, aside from training camps. He needs a good advisor, and support of his parents—but they are not to advise him on what to do. Then we’ll see.
It’s not a strong opinion; it’s a dry opinion on the basis of my experience."
GK= Gillian Kemmerer- she's a journalist, and host for a few shows for the KHL.
SF= Sergei Fedorov
ONE-ON-ONE WITH SERGEI FEDOROV — The Caviar Diplomat
Apologies if this was posted before. Just read a bunch of her articles, there's more where she asks about VK to other players, interesting and insightful stuff!
The part where SF says he's seen "great young talents where nothing happens" damn that worries me a tiny bit lol considering the Rangers' historic great luck at top first round picks.
Well, we can be patient, but the onus is on VK now. He's at camp, he's getting face time with Quinn, and other coaches, he's with fellow Russians (and young players/prospects as well), he's seeing how the top players and consummate pros like Kreiders, Zibbys, Lundqvists, and Fasts of the league practice and play every day, and he's experiencing the push for a stanley cup. If none of these factors can improve his mental space, or encourage him to bust his ass (even if it's only a top 9 spot), then SF may be right in that the Rangers should've just left VK in Russia.
Pretty interesting hearing this from Kovy. Very insightful, even if he doesn't have specific knowledge of Kravtsov himself. Kovy must have learned a lot over his career.
Pretty interesting hearing this from Kovy. Very insightful, even if he doesn't have specific knowledge of Kravtsov himself. Kovy must have learned a lot over his career.