Canada's teams not winning the Stanley Cup won't really make it irrelevant. The Cup is the holy grail, but icing consistently competitive teams and making the Conference finals or SCFs are just as important for maintaining interest in the sport. Hockey is just too far ingrained into our culture for us to lose interest even over a generation by not winning a Cup. Edmonton and Toronto kept their fanbases through some seriously dour years, Vancouver will too.
As someone who's lived in five Canadian cities, hockey's big pretty much everywhere in this country. And Team Canada doing well is more relevant to me from a nationalism / patriotism point of view than a Canadian team you have no affiliation to winning.
Personally, I'm more concerned with relentless dilution of the league product without adding more Canadian representation (expanding into Vegas, Seattle, Portland, etc. without adding another Canadian team), making the Cup even more difficult to win without giving its largest fanbase/shareholders enough product, but that's a dumb rant for another dumb thread
Didn't watch the vid, who are actual remaining realistic names that can be added? It's gotta be amongst the current 8 teams, as everyone else has already been asked and said no presumably. I'm still more concerned re: the D but very optimistic that Burns remains a remote possibility. That'd be bigger than whatever realistic G replacement we'd get at this point. Czechs were a bit unlucky in the scoreline, it was a closer game than 4-1 for sure.