No i didnt not. I wrote that you were stupid i f you thought..... so I didnt wrote that you was stupid.The irony is that if they would score a lot normally they would not have been count in that quota of energy players from the start. I have no problem with energy players, I love players like Rakell, I have problems with when people are forcing in low scoring energy players just for the sake of having low scoring energy players in the team, energy players can produce also.
Scoring deph is importent, it is importent to have offensive good players even in the 4th line. You can win without it, but it certainly make it easier if you have scoring deph. Just look at columbus, they have high scoring players like Hartnell and Gagner in the 4th line, they do not have any mega super star, but their scoring deph give them a edge. Replacing Gagner and Hartnell with some low scoring players would not make them better.
Star-player? It off course depends on where you draw the line, but Boqvist could be consider a star player, Davidsson and Bratt not that far off. But sure we still have a decent deph, but it could have been better.
Yes you did, but lets forget that. So again we do not have other players that offers that?
But i have already said what I want to say about the Lööke case. So i dont need to do it again.