This would be my roster of choice on this given date:
Vehviläinen
Heljanko
Ruusu
Juolevi
Saarijärvi
Välimäki
Niemeläinen
Salo
Vaakanainen
Parikka
Saarela
Nättinen
Borgström
Ruotsalainen
Kuokkanen
Puljujärvi
Björkqvist
Tammela
Koivula
Tolvanen
Vesalainen
Palmu
Vidgren
In the bubble for sure. Too bad we can only take seven. These classes 97-99 are deeeeeep on D.Miro Heiskanen?
This would be my roster of choice on this given date:
My criteria for him were reasonable amount of experience from men's games and slotting well as a "typical" 4th line guy. Need one or two of those as well. I certainly don't expect anything fancy from him.Not a fan of Vidgren, doesn't seem to have much head for the game. I think Rautakorpi has better options available than him.
Age might come to issue. He's a '99 born, with many equal options available from the two elder classes. Not that I've got anything against him personally. After all, our best d-man last year was two years underage, and guys like Määttä and Ristolainen fared well as well. But back then, there was not this much competition.Heiskanen is a lock to make the team I think.
No argument from me here. Only truly obvious no-brainer locks are Juolevi and Saarijärvi, beyond them there're roughly a dozen names who have a realistic shot. In a situation like this, I gave some preference to guys who have U20 experience from the previous year. For example Heiskanen's yet to break his cherry here, which gave me some pause. No doubt though that it will happen soon.Salo didn't exactly ace the tournament in Hodonin and Vaakanainen hasn't even played under Rautakorpi yet. On the other hand, Jokiharju and Jesper Mattila performed reasonably well at Plymouth in August and proved that they are capable of executing Rautakorpi's game plan. There's definitely room for speculation when looking at D. And who knows what Rautakorpi really thinks about guys like Kotkansalo, Vainio, Reunanen, Almari, Rautanen, Ilomäki and Leskinen. He might surprise us with few of his final selections.
Goalies are about on par. D will be miles better than last year. 2016 may have advantage in forwards, but not by a lot.Is this years Finnish JWC team a gold candidate?
Is this years Finnish JWC team a gold candidate?
Miro Heiskanen?
He could, but it's by no means an automatic decision. If the Oil thinks he's high up on the reserve chart, as in one of those players they want to recall at any second, then it could be the answer is still no.If Pulju plays in AHL, could he be in WJC team?
If Pulju plays in AHL, could he be in WJC team?
Zero chance for Laine and Aho, I guess.
Pretty sure if he's in the AHL they have to release him like the Leafs had to release Nylander and Kapanen last year. To stop this though they would just have to recall him before the cut off point and keep him up. Nashville managed to keep Fiala out of the tournament last year for the Swiss, but they may have a different agreement than Sweden and Finland. Also, teams might be less reluctant this year, because it isn't played on the other side of the Atlantic.He could, but it's by no means an automatic decision. If the Oil thinks he's high up on the reserve chart, as in one of those players they want to recall at any second, then it could be the answer is still no.
But if he's in the farm, there's no shame in presuming they let him go as long as they haven't said otherwise.
Any NHL fixture (as Laine and Aho appear to be) obviously has a snowflake's chance in a sauna.
Pretty sure if he's in the AHL they have to release him like the Leafs had to release Nylander and Kapanen last year. To stop this though they would just have to recall him before the cut off point and keep him up. Nashville managed to keep Fiala out of the tournament last year for the Swiss, but they may have a different agreement than Sweden and Finland. Also, teams might be less reluctant this year, because it isn't played on the other side of the Atlantic.
Dude, irrelevant. You're mixing up our NT management's selections with the club team's decisions. It doesn't matter whether Jalonen wanted Kapanen or no, the main argument about the obligation/willingness to release would still have stood either way.Actually it was really close that Kapanen would have been the team at all.
He's almost locked in the team already.
Only an injury keeps him sidelined for world juniors
Miro Heiskanen is playing 19 minutes per game in FEL. I am really surprised, if he is not in the team. My prediction for D is:
Juolevi
Saarijärvi
Välimäki
Niemeläinen
Salo
Vaakanainen
Heiskanen
Parikka has played well, but the competition for the spots in the U20 team is extremely tough for Dmen.
One of the most interesting points about the team this year is will Palmu make the team. I sure hope so as I don't really see how it could be justified if he will not.
How many players from the tournament in sweden have a chance to make the final team?
For Finlands sake, not many I hope. At least in the game against sweden they've all been quite terrible.
Many of our best players play in the North America.How many players from the tournament in sweden have a chance to make the final team?
For Finlands sake, not many I hope. At least in the game against sweden they've all been quite terrible.