vorky
@vorkywh24
- Jan 23, 2010
- 11,607
- 1,374
I guess that setting a league-wide minimum capacity could be something to consider in the future but not in the present as games are sold out only rarely.
I get the point, but disagree. A league-wide minimum capacity should be set since day 1. Plus other conditions I mentioned earlier. You can not have such a big gap (great arena in Berlin vs 2500 seats arena in Grodno) in the tournament. Of course if you want the tournament to grow. But it will not grow with small arenas with bad conditions for TV broadcasting. If you will not approve higher minimal standards, then the tournament will have the same quality in 2014 and 2022. No progress. If you do not increase an average standard of the tournament, then you will not earn more money from TV contracts & sponsors in the future. I have read many interiews of the CHL officials, but I have never read what are their plans ... all they say is "we want the KHL on board", "we want to be the best hockey league in Europe", but no details.
KHL & CHL. The KHL has its standard & the KHL top teams are even better, of course only these top KHL teams would play the CHL. The KHL wants to see if the CHL standard is on KHL level before the KHL joins the CHL. As simple as that. That is one of reasons why the KHL in not on board. How can the KHL find out the CHL´s standard? One option is to play a friendly match between the leagues, which the CHL does not want. You need go step by step, not to claim "we want the CHL on board but under our conditions".
The CHL did the same mistake as the KHL - too many clubs. Even 32 teams is too many, not speaking about previous 48. Your average goes down with so many uneven clubs. The KHL has understood it, so there is a contraction. But I do not believe the CHL is able to contract to some reasonable level (12-18).