Speculation: 2014 Offseason - Roster Building / Trade Speculation Thread IV

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
It's like the old-boy's club all over again. Buy-out Richards' 6.67 cap hit, but hand 5 million of it to a 38 year old? What?

Wasn't the point of buying out Richards so they could retain their own UFAs and RFAs?

This is what that was for. Re-sign Stralman. Everytime one of our own EARNS a pay-raise with the club, Sather hard-balls them. But, he is willing to dump a truck load of cash on some mercinary that hasn't proven they can handle playing in New York, hasn't proven they fit in the locker room.

It's backwards.

They bought-out Richards so they don't have a future problem, given his perceived decline in skills. That money would be used on whichever players are deemed to make the team better, be it currently on the roster or UFAs or through trades in which what's coming back costs more than what's going out as well as retain players they want to keep. It's the whole kit and kaboodle. I'm not saying sign Boyle, but one highlighted weakness from the finals was the PP point, and the PP as a whole. As GM, you should inquire. Doesn't mean you're going to pull the trigger on any amount, but all options need to be explored to fill as many holes as you can to ice the best team possible. Status quo wasn't going to work, and that's out the window anyways since one piece, Richards, who for all his shortcomings was a cog to a SCF team, is no longer with them.
 
I like how the Rangers doing their due diligence and checking in on other free agents is viewed like this.

Likely fact: Rangers placed a call for D. Boyle's agent.

Not a fact: Rangers are still interested after hearing a price

Definitely not a fact: Rangers are prioritizing Boyle over Stralman

I am a bit worried, however, that Sather will lose site of the strong defensive foundation this team has in order to push to improve the offense. We'll see.

Based on all of the reports, the Rangers are playing it tough with Stralman. They've seemingly set their limit at 4 years. If the difference between losing Stralman or keeping him is an extra 2 years, and they refuse to go the extra 2 years, that is a blunder IMO.

Is it a likely fact that Sather loses interest in Boyle after hearing the demands? I'm not so sure, the track record speaks volumes, IMO.

They can do their due diligence, but the fact their due diligence includes a 38 year old seeking 5 million per is reason enough to start getting worried.

Their due diligence also included 35 year old Joe Thornton, and injury prone Spezza. Not instilling tge same kind of confidence i had a week ago.
 
They bought-out Richards so they don't have a future problem, given his perceived decline in skills. That money would be used on whichever players are deemed to make the team better, be it currently on the roster or UFAs or through trades in which what's coming back costs more than what's going out as well as retain players they want to keep. It's the whole kit and kaboodle. I'm not saying sign Boyle, but one highlighted weakness from the finals was the PP point, and the PP as a whole. As GM, you should inquire. Doesn't mean you're going to pull the trigger on any amount, but all options need to be explored to fill as many holes as you can to ice the best team possible. Status quo wasn't going to work, and that's out the window anyways since one piece, Richards, who for all his shortcomings was a cog to a SCF team, is no longer with them.

I'm not sure the issue was from the point though. They really lacked a serious net front presence and someone who can really snipe the puck consistently. McDonagh was good on the point. I think MZA would be good next to him out there.

Who can pick corners consistently on offense?
 
Based on all of the reports, the Rangers are playing it tough with Stralman. They've seemingly set their limit at 4 years. If the difference between losing Stralman or keeping him is an extra 2 years, and they refuse to go the extra 2 years, that is a blunder IMO.

Is it a likely fact that Sather loses interest in Boyle after hearing the demands? I'm not so sure, the track record speaks volumes, IMO.

They can do their due diligence, but the fact their due diligence includes a 38 year old seeking 5 million per is reason enough to start getting worried.

Their due diligence also included 35 year old Joe Thornton, and injury prone Spezza. Not instilling tge same kind of confidence i had a week ago.

Yet, nothing has changed at all.

Ill get worried when a ****** deal is announced.
 
I really can't understand the desire for Boyle. This team is about transition and speed with the defensemen joining the rush. Moore. Stralman. McDonagh. All good skaters. Even Klein has proven to be a very good fit. Boyle can move the puck but he is SLOW

Exactly.

And so is Staal.

The minute Vigneault was hired, they should have been looking at the long-term picture and guage who fits the style and system Vugneault and his staff were going to be growing.

4.5 for Stralman or 6+ for Staal?

4.5 for Stralman or 5 for Boyle?

McDonagh - Girardi
x - Stralman
Moore - Klein

There are 3 guys there that can legitimately skate at a high level.

McDonagh - Girardi
Staal - x
Moore - Klein

Now there are 2.

And it isn't just about the skating. Vigneault is heavy into the newer stats like Corsi. Stralman is his kind of player.
 
Yet, nothing has changed at all.

Ill get worried when a ****** deal is announced.

agreed.

I'd be more concerned in the Rangers brass didn't check in with every FA they think can help.

We have between the 25th and 30th to talk to players about roles and situations. They should split the FA pool into three groups and have Sather and a few minions attack one group, Gorton and a few minions attack another and Clarke and a few minions attack the last group.

get together on Monday and compare notes.

you may find a few guys that wouldn't mind coming here on the cheap. Who knows.

If you don't ask the questions, you will NEVER know the answer.

Kick tires on everyone.
 
I'm not sure the issue was from the point though. They really lacked a serious net front presence and someone who can really snipe the puck consistently. McDonagh was good on the point. I think MZA would be good next to him out there.

Who can pick corners consistently on offense?

I too am not sure the issues is from the point, however, the point play decreased with the loss of Richards, believe it or not, and that's an important position. Personally I think it's an upfront issue, which is tougher to change since you have some guys who aren't going anywhere. Perhaps the answer lies with Kreider's big body in front of the net fighting it out and getting the loose pucks in front of the net and deflecting point shots. A different strategy than pass as much as possible and create an opening.
 
Exactly.

And so is Staal.

The minute Vigneault was hired, they should have been looking at the long-term picture and guage who fits the style and system Vugneault and his staff were going to be growing.

4.5 for Stralman or 6+ for Staal?

4.5 for Stralman or 5 for Boyle?

McDonagh - Girardi
x - Stralman
Moore - Klein

There are 3 guys there that can legitimately skate at a high level.

McDonagh - Girardi
Staal - x
Moore - Klein

Now there are 2.

And it isn't just about the skating. Vigneault is heavy into the newer stats like Corsi. Stralman is his kind of player.

I think a full season of evaluation is needed to see who fits and who doesn't.

Guys took almost half a season just to learn the system. Another half a season refining it. I don't think you can get a full understanding of who does and doesn't get it.

I think that MDZ was the exception and not the rule in the sense of being dealt mid season while learning a new more complex system. The fact that he **** the bed in Nashville leads me to believe that the Rangers had thsi feeling about him and were probably looking at moving him over the summer and the deal was finally consumated mid season.

Trades in the NHL USUALLY take a few weeks/months to hash out. Even the simplest swaps like this.

I can see Staal getting moved tomorrow as much as I can see him standing on the NYR bench on opening night at MSG
 
Odd that the people who kill Sather are the ones who are giving him the benefit of the doubt. For me, it's more because of the constraints around Sather, vis-a-vis the lack of assets and the lack of cap space.

Same here.

And he has a team that just made the final (and did so playing the way he likes - for now), so Im less inclined to think hes going to do something really drastic and stupid.

And, to your point, the bounds of reality handcuff him quite a bit. No assets, No cap space.
 
Same here.

And he has a team that just made the final (and did so playing the way he likes - for now), so Im less inclined to think hes going to do something really drastic and stupid.

And, to your point, the bounds of reality handcuff him quite a bit. No assets, No cap space.

Eh, when AV was first brought in, he even said he was going to evaluate his players. Normally after the 1st season is when a coach likes to put his stamp on the team.
 
You really need to stop suggesting that as a way to get rid of players. In order to be placed on LTIR for the rest of his contract, the player has to be injured and unable to play for the rest of his contract.

And concerning Stralman, the difference is that he is 27. Even if we give him max years, he'll be 35 when the contract ends. He isn't going to retire before then, barring a career ending injury, but that's not something we should be banking on.

What do you know that the best GMs in this league don't?

Players loose their game, or they don't. Gabby won't play on a 4th line in LA when he is 36 y/o to collect a paycheck if his body fails him.

In 7 years, Stralman will be 35 and the cap will be 100m. He would be a steal then. Or he will be Kim Johnson II, I can't rule that out. If the later scenario happens, he wouldn't hurt us either. It's some inbetween scenario that would hurt us, a bit. On the other hand, it's not only a risk -- it's also a great opertunity. Most players like Stralman peak when they are 34-35. He could become a huge steal too at like 3.8-4m on a front loaded deal.

All the best GMs use these contracts. I am not inventing the wheel here, merely asking why we can't do what the best GMs do.
 
Last edited:
Eh, when AV was first brought in, he even said he was going to evaluate his players. Normally after the 1st season is when a coach likes to put his stamp on the team.

You could argue that AV has already put is stamp on this team. Del Zotto out. Pyatt out. Callahan out. The likes of Asham and Powe never in.
 
OK Gag whatever. You let the rest of us know what you know that the best GMs in this league don't.

Players loose their game, or they don't. Gabby won't play on a 4th line in LA when he is 36 y/o to collect a paycheck if his body fails him.

In 7 years, Stralman will be 35 and the cap will be 100m. He would be a steal then. Or he will be Kim Johnson II, I can't rule that out. If the later scenario happens, he wouldn't hurt us either. It's some inbetween scenario that would hurt us, a bit. On the other hand, it's not only a risk -- it's also a great opertunity. Most players like Stralman peak when they are 34-35. He could become a huge steal too at like 3.8-4m on a front loaded deal.

All the best GMs use these contracts. I am not inventing the wheel here, merely asking why we can't do what the best GMs do.

There exists no world where the NHL cap will be 100m. What's the floor going to be if that happens? $80m? Would love to see some of the teams around the NHL have to spend to that.
 
You could argue that AV has already put is stamp on this team. Del Zotto out. Pyatt out. Callahan out. The likes of Asham and Powe never in.

Maybe. I am sure he used his personnel as best as he could but if he had more say into his players, I am sure he has as couple of changes he would like to see.



Stephen Whyno ‏@SWhyno 1m
Update from #NHLJets availability w/ GM Kevin Cheveldayoff: He'll listen to offers on any player, won't tell us much else. #Kane #Byfuglien

Open for business
 
to me Klein is more reliable than Moore so loosing Stralman and giving some minutes to Klein is not horrible.

Sign Boyle for some of those minutes and the PP. McIlrath should also be close

LD has Allen and Skjei but who knows when / if they will be ready. Keep Staal
 
You could argue that AV has already put is stamp on this team. Del Zotto out. Pyatt out. Callahan out. The likes of Asham and Powe never in.

That's true, although he may have wanted Callahan in, but Sather didn't want him in at the cost, since they did try initially to keep him. But then again, perhaps they gave Callahan an offer they knew he would refuse. Should be an exciting week ahead.
 
That's true, although he may have wanted Callahan in, but Sather didn't want him in at the cost, since they did try initially to keep him. But then again, perhaps they gave Callahan an offer they knew he would refuse. Should be an exciting week ahead.

6 for 6 seemed beyond reasonable.
 
Moving Staal to accommodate Stastny is COUNTER PRODUCTIVE

How? By trading Staal we clear cap space and re-stock our draft picks in one fell swoop. That cap space can be used to address a glaring need. Staal also has a year left on his deal and his value is high. It's actually extremely productive
 
What do you know that the best GMs in this league don't?

Players loose their game, or they don't. Gabby won't play on a 4th line in LA when he is 36 y/o to collect a paycheck if his body fails him.

Which GM's are you referring to? Holmgren who has Pronger on LTIR because Pronger suffered a career ending injury? Chiarelli who has Savard on LTIR because he suffered a career ending injury? Or maybe Yzerman, who has Ohlund on LTIR because he suffered a career ending injury. None of these players will play again because they are physically incapable of playing, not because they suck and the team wanted to get rid of them.

Any GM that tries to put a player on LTIR indefinitely when the player doesn't have an injury that prohibits him from playing will get hammered by the NHL for circumvention. You think I'm wrong? Tell me which GMs have done it.

In 7 years, Stralman will be 35 and the cap will be 100m. He would be a steal then. Or he will be Kim Johnson II, I can't rule that out. If the later scenario happens, he wouldn't hurt us either. It's some inbetween scenario that would hurt us, a bit. On the other hand, it's not only a risk -- it's also a great opertunity. Most players like Stralman peak when they are 34-35. He could become a huge steal too at like 3.8-4m on a front loaded deal.

All the best GMs use these contracts. I am not inventing the wheel here, merely asking why we can't do what the best GMs do.

I'm not saying that we shouldn't give Stralman 7 years. What I'm saying is that giving him 7 years isn't remotely the same as giving Gaborik 7 years, because the expectation is that Stralman is going to play out the entire contract and Gaborik likely won't.
 
Just looking through the UFA dmen, what a rough list. It is going to stink if/when the Rangers lose Stralman.

Mark Fayne and Tom Gilbert would be the two guys that stick out that could fit if Stralman leaves, I'm just not sure how much cheaper they are really going to be compared to Stralman.

Gilbert should come cheap. Came off a $3.5M contract that was bought out then started on a mkinimum $900,000 salary this year.

Can't see him taking more than 2, regardless of performacne
 
Boyle on a one year deal with incentives that would count against cap next season would be perfect IMO.
That gives Allen and McIlrath another year to develop without being force fed.
Let's face it...someone is giving Stralman 5 / $4.5 which is too much term and money for a guy who privodes little offense.

We all wanted Richards gone for obvious reasons, but he did QB the PP for us. We need someone other than McD to play the point. Boyle would be perfect.

Of course if its 2 x $5.5m I would feel differently.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad