STK, would you characterize Bennett as tough/gritty or more cheap/chippy or something else? And did I read a Gilmour comparison somewhere? I know comparisons to past great players is usually silly, but it does give a frame of reference to those of us who've never really seen a kid play.
He's closer to the chippy description. This recent suspension aside, I don't really think he's cheap. He's not an agitator like Marchand or Cooke, who go out of their way to get under the opposition's skin, nor is he the type that's running around cheap shotting players. He's just a guy who will initiate contact, and who will push back (sometimes crossing the line) when confronted.
The Gilmour comparison is more accurate in terms of his temperament. He's got that same fire Gilmour had. He plays with an edge, and sometimes that edge causes him to cross the line (thus this recent suspension). But on the whole, his game is more about playing physical and not backing down.
Also, since you seem to really know the OHL, would you skew Ekblad towards NHL-ready and Dal Colle towards 2 years away?
If you've followed my posts, I tend to be ultra conservative when it comes to prospects. So I'm one of the few who actually thinks unless a prospect dominates junior hockey -- and I mean dominates with a capital 'D' -- to the point where they literally look like they're playing at a level above their peers, there's always something they can improve upon in junior. I don't view Ekblad as one of those types who are head and shoulders above their peers.
Having said that, Ekblad's probably as close to NHL ready as any prospect in this year's draft. He's got the size and strength to handle NHL competition. So while I don't think he'll have the kind of first year impact a guy like Seth Jones has had this year, he's close enough that he can start the year in sheltered minutes, then progress up the depth chart depending on how he handles the transition.
Dal Colle has made huge strides from his rookie season to this season, so I'm hesitant to label him as "NHL-ready" or "2 years away", etc. Similar to Bennett, one of the main things that might hinder him is his lack of weight/strength. Talent-wise, I think Dal Colle can play in the NHL next year. But one more year of junior would allow him to work on his defensive game (which isn't NHL-ready, IMO), and to bulk up and get stronger.
On the other hand, you see how well a guy like Brandon Saad has transitioned to the NHL. I personally think Dal Colle will be better than Saad when all is said and done, but how much of Saad's quick success is due to him having a more "NHL body" compared to Dal Colle? If Dal Colle can bulk up over the summer, who knows? However, the conservative in me thinks at least one more junior season for Dal Colle. After that, all bets are off.
Finally, do you see the WHL kids much or at all? I'm intrigued by Fleury's size and July birthday and the descriptions of his play (seems to be a real smart/poised d-man, which I love).
Unfortunately, I catch only the occasional WHL game on TV. So I really don't have a large enough sample size to comfortably comment on Fleury's game.