krazy kanuck
Registered User
I thought it might be worthwhile to start a thread to discuss who will bid on and who should be awarded the Memorial Cup. Talk has taken over the trade rumour thread, so hopefully we can have that conversation here. Having volunteered at the Memorial Cup (Mississauga 11) before, I have had a little bit of a glimpse into a winning presentation video. Here is my analysis, with some some things to consider:
Franchise Stability
Let's assume that North Bay will be out just because they'll have enough going on next season.
Historical Locations
This wasn't in the video, but the first thing to consider is who has hosted before. Since 1972, the following OHL cities have hosted The Memorial Cup:
Mississauga (11)
Kitchener (08), (84), (75)
London (05)
Guelph (02)
Ottawa (99), (72)
Peterborough (96)
Sault Ste Marie (93), (78 - with Sudbury)
Hamilton (90)
Oshawa (87)
Windsor (81)
Sudbury (78 - with SSM)
The following current OHL teams have never hosted the Memorial Cup:
Barrie, Belleville, Brampton/North Bay, Erie, Kingston, Owen Sound, Plymouth, Saginaw, and Sarnia.
I think it is safe to assume that Mississauga and Kitchener would be out. Mississauga hosted last time around, while Kitchener has already had 3 of the 14 OHL Memorial Cups. The shortest time in between two cups has been 9 years, so London can't be ruled out. Everybody else is in based on this criteria, but at least we've eliminated 2 more teams.
Hockey Facilities
Of the remaining cities that would definitely make the grade for their arenas would include (5,000 seats and up): Erie, Kingston, Oshawa, Ottawa, London, Saginaw, Sarnia, Sault Ste Marie, Sudbury, Windsor
On the cusp would be (4,000-5,000 seats): Barrie, Sudbury, Peterborough, Guelph
Teams eliminated based on their facilities would likely be: Belleville, Niagara (I doubt they would be willing to award it based on the new arena with a projected completion 3 months before the tournament) Owen Sound and Plymouth.
Availability of Hotels
This is a consideration, but I'm not sure that we can knock any remaining teams out here. It was a problem for Barrie in 1999, but there has been considerable development there over the past decade.
Airport Access
I'm not sure this is a deal breaker either (although Mississauga did mention it in their video). Of the remaining teams those with an advantage would include, in order: Ottawa, Guelph, Barrie. Honourable mentions to Oshawa and Windsor (I know Detroit is right there, but that doesn't have easy flights to most Canadian centres like Toronto and Ottawa do).
Team Competitiveness
Well, we still have two thirds of the teams and we're running out of criteria. Team competitiveness is a big one that's left though. I think this probably rules out Erie, Ottawa, Peterborough and Saginaw. I think it's pretty clear they'll be looking at 14-15, 15-16 before they're ready to contend. Oshawa also seems to me like a team that will need to rebuild next year. You would think you could, and I would like to, write off the Spitfires here. They've stated they're building for next year and Rychel seems to find a way (even if he has to go a little offside to do it).
London has a clear advantage here. The Colts and Storm were preparing for next year all along.
Ownership
I've cut out half a little more than half the league and ownership will play into it. I'm just not that privy to the various owner's affairs. We can say that Barrie, Kingston and Windsor submitted proposals last time and it sounds like Barrie, London and Windsor at least will be applying next time around.
The Potentials
We're down to:
Barrie: On the positive side, will have a strong team with a star, great central location with close access to Toronto and Pearson airport, and they have never had it before. On the negative side, smallish rink (may even have to add a few seats).
Guelph: Team should be on the upswing and like Barrie a great location. They have had it in the past decade, and I haven't heard they are even interested.
Kingston: I'm not sure what to think about Kingston. You think the team should get better, but they haven't done serious damage in recent memory. The rink is right, the location is ok. Didn't get it last time out. Do they try again?
London: Clearly has a the right rink, and the team should be very exciting next year. Location isn't the best, but isn't inconvenient. They just had it 8 years ago though...9 by the time the cup comes around. I hope they don't go back.
Sarnia: I don't know if there is talk in Sarnia of bid. I guess I would ask why not?
Sault Ste. Marie and Sudbury: They're similar for me. They've both had it before and location wise they're inconvenient enough I'm not sure you rush to go back. Also, the teams are just mediocre for next year...not sure of their intentions.
Windsor: Probably would have been the frontrunner a 18 months ago. I'm not sure now. They've had it before, but not in eons. The team is underperforming by the Rychel regime's standards, and there was the sanctions issue. Like London the rink is right, the fanbase is there, the location isn't the best but it isn't overly inconvenient.
Of the teams that have never had it before, I think Barrie, Sarnia and Kingston are in the conversation. Of the teams that have, I think you're talking about London with an edge over Windsor.
Franchise Stability
Let's assume that North Bay will be out just because they'll have enough going on next season.
Historical Locations
This wasn't in the video, but the first thing to consider is who has hosted before. Since 1972, the following OHL cities have hosted The Memorial Cup:
Mississauga (11)
Kitchener (08), (84), (75)
London (05)
Guelph (02)
Ottawa (99), (72)
Peterborough (96)
Sault Ste Marie (93), (78 - with Sudbury)
Hamilton (90)
Oshawa (87)
Windsor (81)
Sudbury (78 - with SSM)
The following current OHL teams have never hosted the Memorial Cup:
Barrie, Belleville, Brampton/North Bay, Erie, Kingston, Owen Sound, Plymouth, Saginaw, and Sarnia.
I think it is safe to assume that Mississauga and Kitchener would be out. Mississauga hosted last time around, while Kitchener has already had 3 of the 14 OHL Memorial Cups. The shortest time in between two cups has been 9 years, so London can't be ruled out. Everybody else is in based on this criteria, but at least we've eliminated 2 more teams.
Hockey Facilities
Of the remaining cities that would definitely make the grade for their arenas would include (5,000 seats and up): Erie, Kingston, Oshawa, Ottawa, London, Saginaw, Sarnia, Sault Ste Marie, Sudbury, Windsor
On the cusp would be (4,000-5,000 seats): Barrie, Sudbury, Peterborough, Guelph
Teams eliminated based on their facilities would likely be: Belleville, Niagara (I doubt they would be willing to award it based on the new arena with a projected completion 3 months before the tournament) Owen Sound and Plymouth.
Availability of Hotels
This is a consideration, but I'm not sure that we can knock any remaining teams out here. It was a problem for Barrie in 1999, but there has been considerable development there over the past decade.
Airport Access
I'm not sure this is a deal breaker either (although Mississauga did mention it in their video). Of the remaining teams those with an advantage would include, in order: Ottawa, Guelph, Barrie. Honourable mentions to Oshawa and Windsor (I know Detroit is right there, but that doesn't have easy flights to most Canadian centres like Toronto and Ottawa do).
Team Competitiveness
Well, we still have two thirds of the teams and we're running out of criteria. Team competitiveness is a big one that's left though. I think this probably rules out Erie, Ottawa, Peterborough and Saginaw. I think it's pretty clear they'll be looking at 14-15, 15-16 before they're ready to contend. Oshawa also seems to me like a team that will need to rebuild next year. You would think you could, and I would like to, write off the Spitfires here. They've stated they're building for next year and Rychel seems to find a way (even if he has to go a little offside to do it).
London has a clear advantage here. The Colts and Storm were preparing for next year all along.
Ownership
I've cut out half a little more than half the league and ownership will play into it. I'm just not that privy to the various owner's affairs. We can say that Barrie, Kingston and Windsor submitted proposals last time and it sounds like Barrie, London and Windsor at least will be applying next time around.
The Potentials
We're down to:
Barrie: On the positive side, will have a strong team with a star, great central location with close access to Toronto and Pearson airport, and they have never had it before. On the negative side, smallish rink (may even have to add a few seats).
Guelph: Team should be on the upswing and like Barrie a great location. They have had it in the past decade, and I haven't heard they are even interested.
Kingston: I'm not sure what to think about Kingston. You think the team should get better, but they haven't done serious damage in recent memory. The rink is right, the location is ok. Didn't get it last time out. Do they try again?
London: Clearly has a the right rink, and the team should be very exciting next year. Location isn't the best, but isn't inconvenient. They just had it 8 years ago though...9 by the time the cup comes around. I hope they don't go back.
Sarnia: I don't know if there is talk in Sarnia of bid. I guess I would ask why not?
Sault Ste. Marie and Sudbury: They're similar for me. They've both had it before and location wise they're inconvenient enough I'm not sure you rush to go back. Also, the teams are just mediocre for next year...not sure of their intentions.
Windsor: Probably would have been the frontrunner a 18 months ago. I'm not sure now. They've had it before, but not in eons. The team is underperforming by the Rychel regime's standards, and there was the sanctions issue. Like London the rink is right, the fanbase is there, the location isn't the best but it isn't overly inconvenient.
Of the teams that have never had it before, I think Barrie, Sarnia and Kingston are in the conversation. Of the teams that have, I think you're talking about London with an edge over Windsor.