Would people here move Nash sometime this year to keep the rest of the roster intact? I think I'd consider it.
If team has the choice, ideally you move because your asset is at the point of roughly highest return; value received will not dramatically improve by holding on to him.
Value received in trade v. value of production, is part of the equation, as is immediate actual v. potential.
All of that in the equation, Nash has a lot going to stay, and would not waive to generically go 'somewhere'.
However, Detroit, if posters are to be believed, wants him, and their GM has lusted for him. Nash would have chance to be with the Zettermeister and the Datsmeister!! In a great hockey city. And he has to realize that he and Girardi are the scape goats for all cap issues here. This is deserved, notwithstanding Hank's paycheck, but we also all understand we are giving Hank a pass here.
If things work out hunky dorey, right away, fine.
If not, his 7.7 or whatever number is going to be brought up constantly.
Does he want that?
Nash is a co-leader here, supposedly, supplanted by MSL and of course McD, and possibly others evolving. If he moves to the Wings, he can be 'the guy'.
Also, I see a win win as to a deal there.
I want Jurco, their last (2014) 1st [Larkin], Helm and their 2015 1st
for
Nash, our 2016 1st, and a throw in (maybe Hrvik?)
Detroit - Jurco is close to ready, but not cracking the lineup yet and if Alfie returns, will prob sit the year anyway; Larkin was just drafted, is 2-3 years away; and sure there is a loss of value on waiting a year for a late first as opposed to what, likely middle of the pack this year (assuming no collapse, no McDavid). What does that leave? Helm? Only real immediate nut for Red Wings is dif on salaries.
Would there even BE another landing pad for him that is worth it to him, us and the acquiring team?
So yeah, we are invested this much, I prefer not to give him away, but I think the above works and gives us a lot of cap. [Would also be interesting to see Helm at C with Hags. Speed.]