While it's easy to vote for the goalie, I still went with Howard. To me, Datsyuk and Z to a large point cancel each other out. Not that I feel that we could win as much with just one of them, but their greatness and clutchness makes it difficult to pick one over the other. On the other hand, without Howard, we have Gustavsson, and Howard's play at times put the team on his back when Datsyuk and Z didn't have it going.
WTF does that even mean, dude.
These aren't voters inside you voting, are they?
Without Howard, the Red Wings are closer to winning the lottery than being in the playoffs.
With what we've seen from Gustavsson, we need to pray Jimmy can handle 65+ games next season.
Datsyuk.
He alone was worth the price admission.
Several players, of course, are deserving of credit, but Dats more than anyone put this team on his shoulder and dragged them to respectability while even making it entertaining for jaded fans like me.
Without Howard, the Red Wings are closer to winning the lottery than being in the playoffs.
With what we've seen from Gustavsson, we need to pray Jimmy can handle 65+ games next season.
You could say that about Z and Datsyuk too.
Without any of the three of them, this team is gutter material. And we were damn lucky they were almost completely healthy the entire time.
It means I can't say one is better than the other.
What?