- Aug 31, 2016
- 19,892
- 5,877
The 2005-06 Carolina Hurricanes have been debated and discussed a lot on History of Hockey, but I figured their other Cup Finalist deserved a thread of its own because I think they were a way bigger anomaly than 2006.
They were the complete opposite of 2006- a not-so-gaudy record (35-26-16-5 compared to 52-22-8), winning a much weaker Southeast Division (2006 also had TB make the playoffs, ATL barely missed, FLA had a decent season.
The 2002 Hurricanes had 91 points- for perspective, the 2005-06 Thrashers had 90 points and missed the playoffs.
This team had a goal differential of 0 (217-217), 1 30-goal scorer (Jeff O'Neill, who had scored 41 the year before), 1 70-point scorer (Ron Francis).
If the 2006 team was defined by Martin Gerber being on the right side of reg. season goalfests and Cam Ward in the playoffs, this team still had Arturs Irbe- but Tom Barrasso of all people started 34 games!
I hear a lot about how the 2006 team caught a lot of playoff breaks (Koivu's eye, Sabres injuries), but the 2002 team I felt caught almost as many breaks if not more.
They won a first round playoff series vs. the Devils in the midst of 3 East Titles in 4 years despite being outscored in the series but winning 2 OT squeakers and a 1-0 game 6 road shutout.
The second round against Montreal.... Therrien, game 4, Molson Miracle, Gilmour shattering the glass. Need I say more?
The third round against Toronto..... they basically benefitted from the division winner home-ice rule, which oddly doesn't affect the Cup Finals (where in 2000, Dallas won their division but second place Atlantic New Jersey got home-ice because of a better record) by winning a bad division whereas Toronto barely got edged out by Boston in a much tougher Northeast Division (4 playoff teams, Buffalo only missed by 5 points).
The Cup Final against Detroit, though..... despite 4-1, they put up a way better fight against the Wings than anyone thought. They were basically in that series until Shanahan's empty netter (Game 2 was tied with 6 minutes left in the third and even game 4 was still a 1-0 game midway through the third)
They were a classic OT team, winning six OT games.
And they did it with a goalie platoon- Kevin Weekes (who won 0 reg. season games) got them to the finish line against New Jersey before Irbe took them the rest of the way.
And despite a mediocre record, they not only got a 3 seed despite the 7th best record in that conference, they had a worse record than non-playoff 90+ point Dallas/Edmonton teams, and when the 1-2 seeds in the East got upset (Boston/Philly), they had home ice up until the Finals!
At least the 2006 team earned their home-ice advantage as a real 2 seed.
Plus, even that 2006 team came at least had a better showing the next few years (Only missed the playoffs by 4 points in 2007, improbably got leapfrogged by Team Ovy in 2008, a shocking run to the 2009 East Finals).
This team? Dead last in 2003, not much better in 2004.
Maybe they're not as revered as the 1994 Canucks/2006 Oilers in terms of Cup cinderella runs, but if anything their lack of dominance and knack of winning close games made them compelling in their own way.
They were the complete opposite of 2006- a not-so-gaudy record (35-26-16-5 compared to 52-22-8), winning a much weaker Southeast Division (2006 also had TB make the playoffs, ATL barely missed, FLA had a decent season.
The 2002 Hurricanes had 91 points- for perspective, the 2005-06 Thrashers had 90 points and missed the playoffs.
This team had a goal differential of 0 (217-217), 1 30-goal scorer (Jeff O'Neill, who had scored 41 the year before), 1 70-point scorer (Ron Francis).
If the 2006 team was defined by Martin Gerber being on the right side of reg. season goalfests and Cam Ward in the playoffs, this team still had Arturs Irbe- but Tom Barrasso of all people started 34 games!
I hear a lot about how the 2006 team caught a lot of playoff breaks (Koivu's eye, Sabres injuries), but the 2002 team I felt caught almost as many breaks if not more.
They won a first round playoff series vs. the Devils in the midst of 3 East Titles in 4 years despite being outscored in the series but winning 2 OT squeakers and a 1-0 game 6 road shutout.
The second round against Montreal.... Therrien, game 4, Molson Miracle, Gilmour shattering the glass. Need I say more?
The third round against Toronto..... they basically benefitted from the division winner home-ice rule, which oddly doesn't affect the Cup Finals (where in 2000, Dallas won their division but second place Atlantic New Jersey got home-ice because of a better record) by winning a bad division whereas Toronto barely got edged out by Boston in a much tougher Northeast Division (4 playoff teams, Buffalo only missed by 5 points).
The Cup Final against Detroit, though..... despite 4-1, they put up a way better fight against the Wings than anyone thought. They were basically in that series until Shanahan's empty netter (Game 2 was tied with 6 minutes left in the third and even game 4 was still a 1-0 game midway through the third)
They were a classic OT team, winning six OT games.
And they did it with a goalie platoon- Kevin Weekes (who won 0 reg. season games) got them to the finish line against New Jersey before Irbe took them the rest of the way.
And despite a mediocre record, they not only got a 3 seed despite the 7th best record in that conference, they had a worse record than non-playoff 90+ point Dallas/Edmonton teams, and when the 1-2 seeds in the East got upset (Boston/Philly), they had home ice up until the Finals!
At least the 2006 team earned their home-ice advantage as a real 2 seed.
Plus, even that 2006 team came at least had a better showing the next few years (Only missed the playoffs by 4 points in 2007, improbably got leapfrogged by Team Ovy in 2008, a shocking run to the 2009 East Finals).
This team? Dead last in 2003, not much better in 2004.
Maybe they're not as revered as the 1994 Canucks/2006 Oilers in terms of Cup cinderella runs, but if anything their lack of dominance and knack of winning close games made them compelling in their own way.