I think both Dryden and Lafleur signed their contracts a few years earlier and the salary structure changed a bit so they end up underpaid even by these standards.Was bunny highly touted? Looks like he was paid pretty good money to be a backup to Dryden.
Meanwhile, Gainey is making peanuts considering his importance to the club.
A duplex in NDG was 25k. Today probably 1.2m?that was massive money back in the day, when fans were lucky to make 15k a year lol
A duplex in NDG was 25k. Today probably 1.2m?
That puts Lafleur at $3.5m salary or so compared to today?
that was massive money back in the day, when fans were lucky to make 15k a year lol
Oh right… well I never said I was an accountant lol.. with Lafleur you have to look at the salary structure when he signed in 1975. So he probably would be underpaid at $8-9m is my guess.If the duplex was 25k, his salary was ~7 times that with 180k.
If the duplex is 1.2m, then his salary would be ~8.4m.
Of course the price of a duplex is not the most exact measure, but I like it.
Today, a player like Lafleur would win 12m, so he would make more than he did back then, but it's still in the same stratosphere.
I think both Dryden and Lafleur signed their contracts a few years earlier and the salary structure changed a bit so they end up underpaid even by these standards.
Not really...today 100k salary is about avg for someone with experience (being generous), Suzuki makes 8mils, 10.5 mil after conversion, thats a 105x of an average fan today.
in the 80s even at 10k is only 15x from a guy like Savard
in the 80s 105x from Savard's salary would equal 1476$/year ... the avg salary of the 80s was 22k and the poverty line was under 11k.
Let that sink in.
When you computer every number this means the vast majority of the population is living under the 80s poverty line.
We're effectively all slaves and we love it.
my parents first house was bought in 71 for 12k, with a 30 year mortgage. my dad made 16k and we felt like we were in the upper class lol. The buying power was so much stronger, until the interest rates hit 20% in the 80's, then everything was lost.
That’s why I pegged the salary conversion to the difference in the price of a duplex from 1978 to now.Yep, its all about buying power. We make more money now than before but we're 10x poorer.
Yep, its all about buying power. We make more money now than before but we're 10x poorer.
inflation never stops, the printing of money is insane.
Bunny usually got the easier games , not that he wasn’t a fine goaltender, but there was only one Dryden!Was bunny highly touted? Looks like he was paid pretty good money to be a backup to Dryden.
Meanwhile, Gainey is making peanuts considering his importance to the club.
Bunny had shown flashes and Dryden had become tired of taking the beating and had one leg in retirement. But as his biography says that was probably 1978-79. Bowman really felt he had to whip that team because they had a lot of miles on them.Bunny usually got the easier games , not that he wasn’t a fine goaltender, but there was only one Dryden!
I never found Dryden to be as great as his numbers. That was a crazy stacked team after all. Sure he was good. Great at times. But looking back, was he really THAT great? I don’t think he was. I was pretty young in the 70’s and didn’t really follow super closely until the late 70’s.Bunny had shown flashes and Dryden had become tired of taking the beating and had one leg in retirement. But as his biography says that was probably 1978-79. Bowman really felt he had to whip that team because they had a lot of miles on them.
Some fans had started asking for Bunny and wondered if he really could do the job just as well since Dryden had declined somewhat at that point. And there were those who might have had a political inclination and wanted yo know why the French goalie wasn’t starting as the late 70s was a politically charged time. Not sure if the majority of those people were really hockey fans or not. I know the kid Ms all loved Bunny but that might also have been because of his nickname lol.
1971… he beat two legit powerhouses. We stopped winning cups as soon as he left too.I never found Dryden to be as great as his numbers. That was a crazy stacked team after all. Sure he was good. Great at times. But looking back, was he really THAT great? I don’t think he was. I was pretty young in the 70’s and didn’t really follow super closely until the late 70’s.
Progress makes things relative. The league had not really seen anything like him when he first came in. A guy that tall with fast feet. If he was coming up today he’d be playing the profly style (really an evolution brought about by knee stacks, which he didn’t have). If Carey Price grew up then he’d look like Ken Dryden. Everything else is conjecture. But the position became about size and athleticism and he had both of those things in reserve. He was also flexible in what was demanded by the style of the day, so I have no doubt he would have been great today. He definitely had the demeanor.I never found Dryden to be as great as his numbers. That was a crazy stacked team after all. Sure he was good. Great at times. But looking back, was he really THAT great? I don’t think he was. I was pretty young in the 70’s and didn’t really follow super closely until the late 70’s.
I never found Dryden to be as great as his numbers. That was a crazy stacked team after all. Sure he was good. Great at times. But looking back, was he really THAT great? I don’t think he was. I was pretty young in the 70’s and didn’t really follow super closely until the late 70’s.
'71 was a great performance. To be fair, though, Dryden wasn't the only person who left after that last Cup win. Pollock, Bowman, Lemaire all left, too.1971… he beat two legit powerhouses. We stopped winning cups as soon as he left too.