I learned long ago to avoid using advanced stats with many posters here, so I'm using the eye test so
they can keep up.
However, Gaunce starts overwhelmingly in defensive zone while Virtanen does not. Yet he still tends to finish his shift in the offensive zone. Also, for what it's worth, Gaunce also has an extremely low shooting % at 4.4 which you could argue is pretty unsustainable. He's not being put into a position to score, and has 2 goals compared to Virtanen's 6, and 3 points to Virtanen's 10.
Does Gaunce need to pick up his offensive play? Yes, it really isn't acceptable. However he's actually solid defensively which is more than I can say for Jake Virtanen. Quite simply Jake's production does not justify his play. Gaunce actually doesn't cost you on the ice and has actually been starting to get some shots on goal. I think we can see some improvement in Gaunce's game while Virtanen has regressed since December.
Virtanen has far more potential than Gaunce will ever have, but I'd rather have Gaunce on the ice than Virtanen.
Seriously though, lets not pretend you were actually looking at advanced stats