Dach and Hughes look better than Kakko.
And I would say the best since McDavid, other than Matthews. But it’s not like it’s a stretch to compare Kakko to Lafreniere. Kakko got a TON of hype, was said to be as NHL-ready as they come, AND he’s already played an NHL season (including the playoffs/play-ins where he looked great, so at the very least, he was a mild disappointment tonight). So it’s not like comparing Chytil to Lafreniere.
Do they really though?
Hughes got bullied all of last year and is allergic to scoring goals. Dach got some primo minutes with Kane towards the end of last year.
The hyperbole tonight is ridiculous and his overall analytics based off of this game alone are really not reflective with how he played.
His issues are really 2 fold...
1. He isn't good at getting the puck back when he doesn't have it, this should be a
major area of focus for him, this is coachable.
2. His best work comes from the dots inwards.
In a game where Panarin was basically dishing pucks out to the Islanders like he was playing for them, #1 was really exaggerated in the statistics (almost all of his xGA can be attributed to Panarin. I don't think he did anything egregious defensively but I'd have to go back and look at the tape to make sure and I'd rather not) and #2 couldn't come into fruition. In fact, I'd say that the coaching staff has done a really, really poor job putting him in a position to use his strengths and last year, tried to turn him into a player that he wasn't (along with him losing his wind like after 20 games.)
But here is the good news, when Panarin decides that he wants to start playing like a good player again, #2 is something that should become MUCH easier for him to do. I don't know if this is the best line for him, but they should stick with it for a while and see what it looks like when Panarin is Panarin instead of what ever the hell he was tonight.
I just don't get where all the hate is coming from. Its one game where our best player was our worst forward and happened to be on Kakko's line.