I go to my local Sam's Club and ask the butcher for whole uncut chuck roll. Yeah, buy in bulk then carve it myself and freeze what I don't cook right away. Save's me a little over $2 a pound. The Chuck portion is right next to the ribeye and usually contains some ribeye meat.
Try the Cauliflower jigamabobbs. really good.
I don't think there is as big a rush to trade Ullmark as the media people want us to believe. It would be in Boston's best interest to have Swayman resigned before moving Ullmark ... even if that means waiting until later in the summer. Now, if Sweeney has his heart set on being in the first round this draft that may change things, but picking up a first for next year instead would be nice too, which could be done later. The players mentioned as trade chips may still be available, especially if they have reached agreement in principle. Assuming someone doesn't get a better offer in the meantime (that never happens, right Mr Sweeney?).Hey guys if we trade Ullmark in couple hours or days, who s going to be Bs goalies? Swayman not signed yet, Bussi not signed yet, can we really trade Linus before Sway is locked? I know he s an RFA but...
The problem with beef today it sits in a Cryovac package in a box gets tossed around leaky bloody packages , there was nothing like "hanging beef"
I am on board with you, to me the main focus should still be two new center, wing to replace JDB and a couple fast, tough wingers for the third and fourth lines.
We have one in Portsmouth and it is awesome.
If Bruins want draft pick this year in deal then there is a rushI don't think there is as big a rush to trade Ullmark as the media people want us to believe. It would be in Boston's best interest to have Swayman resigned before moving Ullmark ... even if that means waiting until later in the summer. Now, if Sweeney has his heart set on being in the first round this draft that may change things, but picking up a first for next year instead would be nice too, which could be done later. The players mentioned as trade chips may still be available, especially if they have reached agreement in principle. Assuming someone doesn't get a better offer in the meantime (that never happens, right Mr Sweeney?).
Next years supposedly a better draft - anyone interested in pushing the 1st to 2025?If it involves this year first round yes it has to be done
Next years supposedly a better draft - anyone interested in pushing the 1st to 2025?
Don't see Detroit as a good trade partner for us. All the players I'd want I doubt they would trade. Larkin, Raymond, Kasper, Edvinsson.Marco Kasper for Linus Ullmark, let’s do it!
Maybe move Marchand down to L3 by November thenYah they need to be on third line but Lysell needs to get a legit shot and I’m starting him on L3 BUT I really want him RW opposite Marchand L2 by November
Yea. Or No. not sure.Are the team making the trade is interested
I included that, lol.If Bruins want draft pick this year in deal then there is a rush
I don't think there is as big a rush to trade Ullmark as the media people want us to believe. It would be in Boston's best interest to have Swayman resigned before moving Ullmark ... even if that means waiting until later in the summer. Now, if Sweeney has his heart set on being in the first round this draft that may change things, but picking up a first for next year instead would be nice too, which could be done later. The players mentioned as trade chips may still be available, especially if they have reached agreement in principle. Assuming someone doesn't get a better offer in the meantime (that never happens, right Mr Sweeney?).
Sorry ...Anyways we will find out soon enough what his value is because he is going.Just speculating. ... Sweeney may want Ottawa's 7oa but Ottawa is only willing to give up #25ov (formally Boston's).
Would a compromise do by taking Ottawa's first round pick next year? It should by lower than 7ov but higher than 25. Would that work? Ottawa is in a tough spot because they have to give up their first in either 25 or 26 draft due to league penalty. (Assuming that penalty still applies)
Second question: what do people think Sweeney considers the greater priority - adding another top 4 LD, or acquiring a top 6 preferably #1 center? No sure things in FA. It is a gamble that who you want will be there.
Lastly concerning Chychrun and his injury history ... it is hard to believe that he has been in the league 9 years already and he is only 26. Again, speculation, but some of his earlier injury history could be attributed to being young and not fully developed (core and stabilizing muscular strength) leaving him more prone to injury. Now at 26, and entering his later 20's, his body may be better developed and able to handle the punishment of the NHL. A risk that may be worth taking.
I included that, lol.
About thirty or forty, I’d sayAre the team making the trade is interested
Agreed. Assuming Swayman signs, but Swayman is a fighter it could go to arbitration again. If that happens the $ may be off unless they reach an agreement on the way to an arbitration settlement. Which pushes it into the later summer.Sweeney needs to know exactly what he has under contract by June 30. He needs to know what cap space he has. So the Ullmark deal needs to be done then, and also the swayman contract
The 25th pick isn't great to have in a 15 player draft, I hope they don't settle for it.Just speculating. ... Sweeney may want Ottawa's 7oa but Ottawa is only willing to give up #25ov (formally Boston's).
Would a compromise do by taking Ottawa's first round pick next year? It should by lower than 7ov but higher than 25. Would that work? Ottawa is in a tough spot because they have to give up their first in either 25 or 26 draft due to league penalty. (Assuming that penalty still applies)
Second question: what do people think Sweeney considers the greater priority - adding another top 4 LD, or acquiring a top 6 preferably #1 center? No sure things in FA. It is a gamble that who you want will be there.
Lastly concerning Chychrun and his injury history ... it is hard to believe that he has been in the league 9 years already and he is only 26. Again, speculation, but ome of his earlier injury history could be attributed to being young and not fully developed (core and stabilizing muscular strength) leaving him more prone to injury. Now at 26, and entering his later 20's, his body may be better developed and able to handle the punishment of the NHL. A risk that may be worth taking.
The problem with beef today it sits in a Cryovac package in a box gets tossed around leaky bloody packages , there was nothing like "hanging beef"
I would bet on Pinto finishing the year over Poitras for one, Poitras, last 10 games he had zero goals4 assists, that was a result of him physically, not being ready for the grind. Pinto is better on faceoffs, had nearly a hit a game, blocked shots. Your making this about who is better, Pinto is ready Poitras is not. Bruin's are not getting Pinto, I get that but if they ever had the chance now you grab him and let Poitras develop, and maybe in the future we would have both and you and I might actually be happy.
Thanks. I have an old-time 1950s meat grinder that I grind my own beef and lamb with.Usually I cut into steaks but one can also grind the side timings for burgers. It is a choice of preference. But, I can usually find ground beef for less $ if your not to picky regarding amount of fat ... and I'm not.
Thanks. I have an old-time 1950s meat grinder that I grind my own beef and lamb with.