I am Bettman
Registered User
- May 23, 2022
- 673
- 1,500
That’s fair, probably better culture wise to keep Linus giving him and Swayman’s relationshipIt’s the $3M per which is essentially a 2 million dollar savings from Ullmark. I would have rather just keep Ullmark.
Because the entire point of trading Ullmark was to shed salary.Idk why people are freaking out. We had no leverage with the NTC. We got a 1st. Korpisalo could be an OK backup. Has been a starter which is good experience if Swayman gets hurt.
I take this over letting him walk next year for nothing. Swayman is ready to take the reigns full time.
how the **** are people missing that? They screwed the pooch at the deadline actually giving a 3 for Peeke and his deal and now this? Do they not remember what it took to offload shit deals?Because it should have cost ottawa a first just to move Korpisalos contract.
It doesn't free up much money at all. $5M - $3M - $0.835M = $1.65M savings. Whoopee!Not super impressed with the return. I'm sure given the market conditions, this is about the best they could fetch. But it's not going to move the needle for next season, except that it frees up some money to use elsewhere.
The #25 overall is okay but this isn't supposed to be a strong draft. Better than no 1st round pick, possible ammunition for other moves, etc.
Not a big Kastelic fan. 4th line mucker, willing to drop the gloves but not that great at it. I assume this means Maroon is gone.
Not happy to have to take back Korpisalo. I'm assuming his stay will not be long. You're taking a goalie from a team that wanted to upgrade in net. So...
I guess this more or less matches my expectation of not getting a killer return. Others may like the return better I suppose.
It’s the $3M per which is essentially a 2 million dollar savings from Ullmark. I would have rather just keep Ullmark.
It’s the $3M per which is essentially a 2 million dollar savings from Ullmark. I would have rather just keep Ullmark.
The first should have been for taking Korpisalo back. Kastelic plus something good should have been the return for UllmarkBecause the entire point of trading Ullmark was to shed salary.
Getting a first back is good. Taking on FOUR years of that deal to save what...2 mil? That's really really poor IMO
Unless there's a part two to this, this deal blows.
He’s a negative value asset. Bruins will have to pay to get someone to take him on.I'm assuming the Bs have no interest in keeping Korpisalo and will flip him for another piece.
Yep. Now we get to read all summer about "Ullmark wasn't going anywhere else" and all the pro management bullshit. Guy had a list of 17 teams he could go to. Wait it out. Maybe one of their goalies go down. Make Ullmark sweat an extension and you'll see how quickly he would have expanded that list. There was zero reason to do it now.This is a bad trade. Markstrom got a better return.